The Development of Constructivist Creative Media in Learning Resources and Learning Networks: A case study of Phuket Mining Museum for Students in Graduated Diploma in Teaching Profession
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to: 1) Develop constructivist creative media in learning resources and learning networks to reach the effective criteria of 80/80. 2) Compare assessment of learning outcome before and after learning with constructivist creative media in learning resources and learning networks, and 3) Study the satisfaction of learners when learning through constructivist creative media in learning resources and learning networks. The research’s design was a one-group pretest-posttest method. The research’s sample were the students in graduated diploma in teaching profession, who were studying in the second semester in academic year 2016 at Phuket Rajabhat University: 1) Sample to find efficiency of creative media, using a multi-stage random sampling with 42 students and 2) Samples to find learning achievement, using classroom unit random sampling consisted of 1 class with 25 students. The tools used in the study were 1) Pretest – Posttest to assess learning achievement, and 2) Evaluation forms of satisfaction of learners in constructivist creative media. Statistics used in data analysis in the study including; mean, standard deviation and t-test. The research found that: 1) creative media based on the constructivist concept efficiency was 83.04 / 83.35. 2) The learning achievement of learners after learning was higher than before learning with constructivist creative media, at a significant level of .05. 3) Satisfaction of learners with constructivist creative media was at a high level.
Article Details
Copyright Notice articles, information, images, etc. was published in this Journal of Yala Rajabhat University is a copyright of the journal Yala Rajabhat University. If any person or deparment wants to bring all or part of it for publish or take any action. Authorization is required in written form from the Journal of Yala Rajabhat University only.
References
2. Egloffa, F., Förstera, N. & Souvigniera, E. (2019). Students´ reading ability moderates the effects of teachers´ beliefs on students´ reading progress. Frontline Learning Research, 7(1), 1-22.
3. Fernando, YJN, S. & Marikar, MMT, F. (2017). Constructivist teaching/learning theory and participatory teaching methods. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 6(1), 110-122.
4. Fongsri, P. (2007). Educational research. (4th ed.). Bangkok: Property Print. (in Thai)
5. Gustafson, K. L. & Branch, R. M. (2002). Survey of instructional development models [Online]. Retrieved April 6, 2018, from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED411780.
6. Israsena na Ayudhya, V. (2016). Things to know about STEM Education. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)
7. Kanjanavarsi, S. (2009). Traditional test theory. (6th ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)
8. Kankarunyakul, H., & Phongern, V. (2013). The development of sketching design book based on constructivism to enchance creative thinking of Mathayomsuksa four students. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University Humanities Social Sciences and arts, 7(1), 831-843. (in Thai)
9. Kasinan, J. (2017). Creative media for enhancing the consciousness of water conservation among youth. Case study: downstream people, Klong Tha Nae Phatthalung Province. Romphruek journal, 35(2), 9-32. (in Thai)
10. Khemmanee, T. & Pramuansilchai, P. (2004). Learning reform in school: Experience and strategy of scholar integrated study with Schools. Bangkok: Pattanakhunnapabvuchakan (PorWor.)Ltd.
11. Laohajarassang, Th. (2000). Using information technology in the era of educational reform. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 3, 28-31. (in Thai)
12. Liang, H. & Li, X. (2018). Research on innovation method of college english translation teaching under the concept of constructivism. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(5), 2455-2461.
13. McGriff, S. J. (2003). Instructional system design (ISD): Using the ADDIE model [Online]. Retrieved April 6, 2018, from: https://www.lib.purdue.edu.
14. Mingsiritham, K. (2016). Creative educational media design. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)
15. Phromwong, Ch. (2013). Media or instruction set performance testing. Silpakorn Educational Research Journal, 5(1), 1-20. (in Thai)
16. Phongphuangphet, P., Piyakul, A., & Sitti, S. (2017). The development of science teaching model based on constructivist theory to enhance knowledge construction ability and eagerness to learn of Prathomsuksa 4 students. Journal of Yala Rajabhat University, 12(2), 93-105. (in Thai)
17. Pongsopa, P. (2001). Educational psychology. Bangkok: Pattanasuksa. (in Thai)
18. Saiyod, A., & Saiyod, L. (2000). Learning performance measurement techniques. (2nd ed.). Bangkok: Suweeriyasan. (in Thai)
19. Sengwong, P (2017). Development of learning innovation through classroom research methods. Bangkok: E.K. Books. (in Thai)
20. Songkram, N. (2010). Multimedia for learning: Design & development. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)
21. Suramane, S., Arreerard, Th., & Arreerard, W. (2016). Teaching- learning model based upon constructivist theory by simulation technique on computer network for education. Journal of Education Mahasarakham University, 10(special issue), 940-956. (in Thai)
21. Sutthirat, Ch. (2010). New learning management, theory, practice and research results. Bangkok: Sahamit Printing and Publishing. (in Thai)
22. Vorrakham, P. (2012). Educational research. (4th ed.). Mahasarakham: Taksila Printing. (in Thai)
บุคลานุกรม
1. อ๋องเอื้อ นักศึกษา (ผู้ให้สัมภาษณ์). ปสุตา แก้วมณี (ผู้สัมภาษณ์). ที่คณะครุศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏภูเก็ต อำเภอเมือง จังหวัดภูเก็ต. เมื่อวันที่ 19 มีนาคม 2559.
2. อามะ นักศึกษา (ผู้ให้สัมภาษณ์). ปสุตา แก้วมณี (ผู้สัมภาษณ์). ที่คณะครุศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏภูเก็ต อำเภอเมือง จังหวัดภูเก็ต. เมื่อวันที่ 19 มีนาคม 2559.
3. สิทธิการ นักศึกษา (ผู้ให้สัมภาษณ์). ปสุตา แก้วมณี (ผู้สัมภาษณ์). ที่คณะครุศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏภูเก็ต อำเภอเมือง จังหวัดภูเก็ต. เมื่อวันที่ 19 มีนาคม 2559.