Analysis of State and Public Role in Public Service Provision as Co-Production Concept
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article purposes to analyze the state role and the public role in public service provision as the co-production concept and clarify the co-production concept which has been influencing the current public service provision. The article findings has shown that the state role and the public role are changed from the former public service provision; that is to say, there is only producer –the public has more opportunity to play a key role here– until there has been also a co-producer. The analysis of the role through the co-production concept, it clarifies the image of public service provision which is being changing from the state hand to the public hand with confidence: the public service will be effective more and more.
Article Details
Copyright Notice articles, information, images, etc. was published in this Journal of Yala Rajabhat University is a copyright of the journal Yala Rajabhat University. If any person or deparment wants to bring all or part of it for publish or take any action. Authorization is required in written form from the Journal of Yala Rajabhat University only.
References
2. Bovaird, T. & Loeffler, E. (2012). From engagement to Co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. International Society for Third Sector Research, 23(4), 1119-1138.
3. Brudney, J. L. & England, R. E. (1983). Toward a definition of the coproduction concept. Public Administration Review, 43(1), 59-65.
4. Calabro, A. (2010). Governance structures and mechanisms in public service organizations: A review and research agenda. In governance structures and mechanisms in public service organizations: Theories, evidence and future directions. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Rome Tor Vergata.
5. OECD. (2011). Together for better public service: Partnering with citizens and civil society. Paris: OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing.
6. Osborne, S. P. (2010). Introduction: The (new) public governance: A suitable case for treatment?. In S.P. Osborne (ed.), The new public governance?: emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. London: Routledge.
7. Ostrom, E., Parks, R. B., Whitaker, G. P. & Percy, S. L. (1978). The public service production process: A framework for analyzing police service. Policy Studies Journal, 7(1), 381-389.
8. Percy, S. L., Kiser, L. L, & Park, R. B. (1980). Citizen coproduction: A neglected dimension of public service delivery. Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Indiana.
9. Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-Production and third sector social services in Europe: Some concepts and evidence. International Society for Third-Sector Research, 23(4), 1102-1118.
10. Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T. & Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production: The state of the art in research and the future agenda. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4),1083-1101.
11. Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the state back in: current research. In P.B. Evans, D. Reuschemeyer & T. Skocpol (eds.), Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Sribun, W., Taengsuwan, P., Piromla, P., Prombarn, W., Udomchokechai, S. & Chaicharnyut, A. (2017). People’s participation network in disaster management at Tambbon Krung Ching, Amphoe Nopphitam, Nakhon Si Thammarat. Journal of Yala Rajaphat University, 12(1), 45-60. (in Thai)
13. Thomas, J. C. (2012). Citizen, customer, partner: Engaging the public in public management. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.
14. Whitaker, G. P. (1980). Coproduction: Citizen participation in service delivery. Public Administration Review, 40(3), 240-246.
