Participatory Communication Strategies of Administrators at Suan Dusit University

Main Article Content

Pattama Laksanayothin
Supasiri Boonprawes
Venus Skunhom
Supaporn Tungdamnernsawad

Abstract

         This research aimed to examine participatory communication strategies of administrators at Suan Dusit University. A qualitative research methodology was employed through in-depth interviews with senior administrators, including the President, Vice Presidents, Deans, and Directors of Offices. Data were analyzed using content analysis.                                                                                      The findings revealed that: 1) The university developed participatory communication strategies through decentralization and empowerment, allowing Vice Presidents to make direct decisions within their respective areas of responsibility, while developing diverse communication channels appropriate for each target group, with informal channels demonstrating high effectiveness; 2) Mindset emerged as the most critical factor for collaborative communication, shared ownership creation, and open-mindedness toward diverse perspectives; organizational culture rooted in the Home Economics School tradition fostered family atmosphere and bonding, though seniority culture resulted in personnel being more receptive than expressive; 3) The university's strengths included family culture, clear structure, and high flexibility, while weaknesses comprised personnel reluctance to express opinions and delayed processes in certain stages; 4) The main challenges were changing personnel mindset, hierarchical culture, and reluctance to engage in constructive criticism; and 5) Administrators played roles as role models, demonstrated openness to listening, and conducted field visits to understand actual problems, alongside continuous evaluation both quantitatively and qualitatively.

Article Details

How to Cite
Laksanayothin, P., S. . Boonprawes, V. . Skunhom, and S. . Tungdamnernsawad. “Participatory Communication Strategies of Administrators at Suan Dusit University”. Mahachula Academic Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, Apr. 2026, pp. 161-82, https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JMA/article/view/285872.
Section
Research Articles

References

มหาวิทยาลัยสวนดุสิต. SDU GOAL 2025-2028: Move forward with “Wisdom & Collaboration” The Power of SDU. กรุงเทพมหานคร: มหาวิทยาลัยสวนดุสิต, ๒๕๖๘.

Benneworth, P., & Jongbloed, B. W. Who Matters to Universities? A Stakeholder Perspective on Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Valorisation. Higher Education. Vol. 59 No. 5 (2010): 567-588.

Bessette, G. Involving the Community: A Guide to Participatory Development Communication. The Pakistan Development Review. Vol. 43 No. 2 (2004): 201-203.

Elsharnouby, T. H. Student Co-Creation Behavior in Higher Education: The Role of Satisfaction with the University Experience. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. Vol. 25 No. 2 (2015): 238-262.

Freire, P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc, 1968.

Habermas, J. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1998.

Iordache-Platis, M., & Josan, I. Communication Efficiency within Higher Education Institutions: The Case of Romania. European Research Studies. Vol. 12 No. 2 (2009): 55-66.

Jacobson, L. T. Participatory Communication for Social Change: The Relevance of the Theory of Communicative Action. Annals of the International Communication Association. Vol. 27 No. 1 (2003): 87-123.

Kunsch, M. M. K. Planejamento de relações públicas na comunicação integrada. Summus Editorial. Brasil: Margarida Kunsch, 2003.

Men, L. R. Strategic Internal Communication: Transformational Leadership, Communication Channels, and Employee Satisfaction. Management Communication Quarterly. Vol. 28 No. 2 (2014): 264-284.

Servaes, J., & Malikhao, P. Participatory Communication: The New Paradigm. In O. Hemer & T. Tufte, Media & Global Change: Rethinking Communication for Development. Sweden/Argentina: Nordicom/CLASCO, 2005.

Singhal, A. Facilitating Community Participation through Communication. New York: UNICEF, 2001.

Tufte, T., & Mefalopulos, P. Participatory Communication: A Practical Guide. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2009.

van der Vyver, C., & Jooste, J. Participatory Communication and Perceptions amongst Staff Members at a Tertiary Education Institution. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 5 No. 7 (2014): 631-646.

Welch, M. Appropriateness and Acceptability: Employee Perspectives of Internal Communication. Public Relations Review. Vol. 38 No. 2 (2012): 246-254.

White, C., Vanc, A., & Stafford, G. Internal Communication, Information Satisfaction, and Sense of Community: The Effect of Personal Influence. Journal of Public Relations Research. Vol. 22 No. 1 (2010): 65-84.