Niḥsvabhãva in MÛlamadhyamakakãrikã

Main Article Content

Waichanin Meesuwan
Kanong Palipatrangkura

Abstract

This research aims to study the concept of nisvabhāva (lack of inherent existence) in the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. It is a textual research study that analyzes data through content description, focusing on understanding and interpreting the concept of nisvabhāva in the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, a foundational work by Nāgārjuna that has had significant influence on Mahāyāna Buddhist thought.


This study systematically and thoroughly examines all 27 chapters of the scripture to explore how the concept of nisvabhāva is presented and explained in various contexts. The findings reveal that Nāgārjuna presents nisvabhāva to refute svabhāva, or the notion of an intrinsic, independent existence of all phenomena. He employs nine types of logical analysis and arguments, one of the key methods being the "catuṣkoṭi" (fourfold negation), which includes: existence, non-existence, both existence and non-existence, and neither existence nor non-existence. This demonstrates the principle of emptiness (śūnyatā) and the interdependent nature of all things.


The concept of nisvabhāva in the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā is not merely a metaphysical proposition, but also a tool to dismantle clinging and attachment, pointing the way toward enlightenment in accordance with the Mahāyāna Buddhist path. This represents the ultimate goal of practice in the Madhyamaka tradition.

Article Details

How to Cite
Meesuwan, W., and K. . Palipatrangkura. “Niḥsvabhãva in MÛlamadhyamakakãrikã”. Mahachula Academic Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, Apr. 2026, pp. 74-93, https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JMA/article/view/286129.
Section
Research Articles

References

บรรณานุกรม

โสรัจจ์ หงส์ลดารมภ์. ปรัชญาทั่วไป. กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักพิมพ์จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย, ๒๕๖๒.

Bhikkhu Dhammajoti. Sarvāstivāda Abhidharma. Hong Kong: Centre of Buddhist Studies, The University of Hong Kong, 2009.

Boquist, A. Trisvabhava: A Study of the Development of the Three-nature-theory in Yogacara Buddhism. In Olsson (Ed.), LUND STUDIES IN AFRICAN AND ASIAN RELIGIONS: Vol. Volume 9 (pp. 7–152) [Print]. PAN EIDOS,1993.

Chatterjee, S. C., & Datta, D. M. An Introduction to Indian Philosophy8th University of Calcutta,1984.

Conze, E. The Large Sutra on Perfect Wisdom: With the Divisions of the Abhisamayãlaṃkãra. Berkeley: University of California Press,1975.

Cox, C. Disputed Dharmas: Early Buddhist Theories on Existence. Tokyo: The International Institute for Buddhist Studies,1995.

Garfield, J. L.The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nãgãrjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakãrikã. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1995.

Gethin, R. The Foundations of Buddhism. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1998.

Kalupahana, D. J. Nāgārjuna: The Philosophy of the Middle Way. State University of New York Press,1986.

Kapoor, S.A Dictionary of Hinduism: Including its Mythology, Religion, History, Literature,andPantheon. New Delhi: Cosmo Publications, 1990.

Larson, G. J. Classical Sāṃkhya: An Interpretation of Its History and Meaning (2nd ed.). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass,1987.

Lin, C.-K. THE SAṃDHINIRMOCANA SUTRA: A LIBERATING HERMENEUTIC [Dissertation]. Temple University Graduate Board,1991.

Matilal, B. K.The Navya-Nyāya Doctrine of Negation: The Semantics and Ontology of Negative Statements in Navya-Nyāya Philosophy. Harvard University Press,1977.

Potter, K. H. (Ed.).Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies: Vol.2 – Indian Metaphysics and Epistemology: The Tradition of Nyāya–Vaiśeṣika up to Gaṅgeśa. Princeton University Press,1977.

Powers, J., Asanga, & Jnanagarbha. Two Commentaries on the Samdhinirmocana-Sutra. In Studies in Asian Thought and Religion (Vol. 13). The Edwin Mellen Press,1992.

Radhakrishnan, S. Indian Philosophy: Volume I (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press,1999.

Siderits, M. Nāgārjuna’s Middle Way: The Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Wisdom Publications,2016.

Williams, Paul & Tribe, Anthony. Buddhist Thought: A Complete Introduction to the Indian Tradition. London and New York: Routledge,2000.