Environment-adaptive automatic ship collision avoidance system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2027.289111Keywords:
Automatic collision avoidance maneuvering; Automatic collision avoidance; Automatic collision risk assessment system; COLREGs compliance; Dynamic ship domainAbstract
Maritime collision accidents remain a critical safety concern despite advances in electronic navigation technology, particularly under adverse weather conditions where reduced visibility and heavy seas substantially degrade a vessel's maneuvering capability. Existing automatic collision avoidance systems typically rely on static ship hazard domains and risk indices that do not incorporate environmental variables, leading to insufficient safety margins in realistic open-sea operation. This paper proposes an integrated environment-adaptive automatic ship collision avoidance system built upon three tightly coupled components: an Automatic Collision Risk Assessment System (ACRAS), a Dynamic Ship Hazard Domain (DSHD) model, and a COLREGs-compliant avoidance algorithm based on a reward-penalty cost function. The ACRAS employs a five-stage hierarchical fuzzy inference architecture containing 160 rules across five functional modules, which simultaneously processes meteorological inputs (wind force, wave height, visibility, and day/night condition) and geometric encounter parameters to produce a normalized Dynamic Risk Factor (DRF) and Final Collision Risk (FCR). The DSHD uses the DRF to dynamically expand the vessel safety boundary with the expansion factor α. The avoidance algorithm employs a three-term cost function comprising course deviation, maneuver stability, and COLREGs penalty terms, combined with a Highest Collision-Risk Ship Candidate priority mechanism to handle multi-vessel encounters. Simulation results demonstrate that the system avoids all five target vessels with a peak rudder deflection of ±23.8° while complying with COLREGs Rules 13, 14, 15, 17, and 8, and adapts autonomously to adverse weather without parameter adjustment. The proposed framework provides a computationally efficient and COLREGs-compliant solution for autonomous ship collision avoidance in variable environments.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cite this article:
APA Style:
Dinh, G. H., Dang, Q. H., Nguyen, V. T., Nguyen, M. H., Tran, C. M., & Nguyen, V. T. (2027). Environment-adaptive automatic ship collision avoidance system. Maritime Technology and Research, 9(1), 289111. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2027.289111
MDPI Style:
Dinh, G. H.; Dang, Q. H.; Nguyen, V. T.; Nguyen, M. H.; Tran, C. M.; Nguyen, V. T. Environment-adaptive automatic ship collision avoidance system. Marit. Technol. Res. 2027, 9, 289111. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2027.289111
Vancouver Style:
Dinh GH, Dang QH, Nguyen VT, Nguyen MH, Tran CM, Nguyen VT. (2027). Environment-adaptive automatic ship collision avoidance system. Marit. Technol. Res. 9(1):289111. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2027.289111
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Highlights
- A hierarchical fuzzy engine fuses weather and geometric risks into a single index
- Cascaded inference cuts the rule base from 28,000 to 160 expert-verifiable rules
- A dynamic risk factor expands the ship hazard domain up to twofold in real time
- A COLREGs-integrated avoidance algorithm yields smooth and auditable maneuvers
- Simulations on a KVLCC2 confirm multi-ship avoidance and adverse seas
References
Aydin, M., Akyuz, E., Turan, O., & Arslan, O. (2021). Validation of risk analysis for ship collision in narrow waters by using fuzzy Bayesian networks approach. Ocean Engineering, 231, 108973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108973
Blaich, M., Rosenfelder, M., Schuster, M., Bittel, O., & Reuter, J. (2012). Fast grid based collision avoidance for vessels using A∗ search algorithm (pp. 385-390). In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Methods & Models in Automation & Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMAR.2012.6347858
Chen, Y., Bai, G., Zhan, Y., Hu, X., & Liu, J. (2021). Path planning and obstacle avoiding of the USV based on improved ACO-APF hybrid algorithm with adaptive early-warning. IEEE Access, 9, 40728-40742. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3062375
Chun, D. H., Roh, M. I., Lee, H. W., Ha, J., & Yu, D. (2021). Deep reinforcement learning-based collision avoidance for an autonomous ship. Ocean Engineering, 234, 109216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109216
Coldwell, T. G. (1983). Marine traffic behaviour in restricted waters. Journal of Navigation, 36(3), 430-444. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300039783
Davis, P. V., Dove, M. J., & Stockel, C. T. (1980). A computer simulation of marine traffic using domains and arenas. Journal of Navigation, 33(2), 215-222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300035220
Dinh, G. H., & Im, N. (2016). The combination of analytical and statistical method to define polygonal ship domain and reflect human experiences in estimating dangerous area. International Journal of E-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 4, 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enavi.2016.06.009
Dinh, G. H., & Im, N. K. (2017). A study on the construction of stage discrimination model and consecutive waypoints generation method for ship’s automatic avoiding action. International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems, 17(4), 294-306. https://doi.org/10.5391/IJFIS.2017.17.4.294
Du, L., Banda, O. A. V., Huang, Y., Goerlandt, F., Kujala, P., & Zhang, W. (2021). An empirical ship domain based on evasive maneuver and perceived collision risk. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 213, 107752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107752
Fiskin, R. (2023). An advanced decision-making model for determining ship domain size with a combination of MCDM and fuzzy logic. Ocean Engineering, 283, 114976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114976
Fujii, Y., & Tanaka, K. (1971). Traffic capacity. Journal of Navigation, 24(4), 543-552. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300022384
Goodwin, E. M. (1975). A statistical study of ship domains. Journal of Navigation, 28(3), 328-344. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300041230
Hasegawa, K., & Kouzuki, A. (1987). Automatic collision avoidance system for ships using fuzzy control. Journal of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects, 205, 2.34-2.58.
http://www.naoe.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp/~hase/cv/papers/013e.pdf
He, Z., Chu, X., Liu, C., & Wu, W. (2023). A novel model predictive artificial potential field based ship motion planning method considering COLREGs for complex encounter scenarios. ISA Transactions, 134, 58-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2022.09.007
Huang, Y., & Van Gelder, P. H. A. J. M. (2020). Collision risk measure for triggering evasive actions of maritime autonomous surface ships. Safety Science, 127, 104708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104708
Im, N., & Luong, T. N. (2019). Potential risk ship domain as a danger criterion for real-time ship collision risk evaluation. Ocean Engineering, 194, 106610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106610
Jiang, L., An, L., Zhang, X., Wang, C., & Wang, X. (2022). A human-like collision avoidance method for autonomous ship with attention-based deep reinforcement learning. Ocean Engineering, 264, 112378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112378
Kundakci, B., Nas, S., & Gucma, L. (2023). Prediction of ship domain on coastal waters by using AIS data. Ocean Engineering, 273, 113921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113921
Kuwata, Y., Wolf, M. T., Zarzhitsky, D., & Huntsberger, T. L. (2014). Safe maritime autonomous navigation with COLREGS, using velocity obstacles. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 39(1), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2013.2254214
Lazarowska, A. (2015). Ship’s trajectory planning for collision avoidance at sea based on ant colony optimisation. Journal of Navigation, 68(2), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463314000708
Lazarowska, A. (2017). A new deterministic approach in a decision support system for ship’s trajectory planning. Expert Systems with Applications, 71, 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.11.005
Lee, C. Y. (1961). An algorithm for path connections and its applications. IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers, 10(3), 346-365. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.1961.5219222
Li, L., Wu, D., Huang, Y., & Yuan, Z. M. (2021). A path planning strategy unified with a COLREGS collision avoidance function based on deep reinforcement learning and artificial potential field. Applied Ocean Research, 113, 102759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2021.102759
Liu, W., Qiu, K., Yang, X., Wang, R., Xiang, Z., Wang, Y., & Xu, W. (2023). COLREGS-based collision avoidance algorithm for unmanned surface vehicles using modified artificial potential fields. Physical Communication, 57, 101980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phycom.2022.101980
Liu, Z., Zhang, B., Zhang, M., Wang, H., & Fu, X. (2023). A quantitative method for the analysis of ship collision risk using AIS data. Ocean Engineering, 272, 113906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113906
Luong, T. N., Hwang, S., & Im, N. (2021). Harbour traffic hazard map for real-time assessing waterway risk using marine traffic hazard index. Ocean Engineering, 239, 109884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109884
Lyu, H., & Yin, Y. (2019). COLREGS-constrained real-time path planning for autonomous ships using modified artificial potential fields. Journal of Navigation, 72(3), 588-608. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463318000796
Mitrofanov, O. (1968). An anti-collision indicator. Journal of Navigation, 21(2), 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300030319
Murray, B., & Perera, L. P. (2021). An AIS-based deep learning framework for regional ship behavior prediction. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 215, 107819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107819
Pietrzykowski, Z. (2008). Ship’s fuzzy domain: A criterion for navigational safety in narrow fairways. Journal of Navigation, 61(3), 499-514. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463308004682
Pietrzykowski, Z., & Uriasz, J. (2009). The ship domain: A criterion of navigational safety assessment in an open sea area. Journal of Navigation, 62(1), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463308005018
Rawson, A., Rogers, E., Foster, D., & Phillips, D. (2014). Practical application of domain analysis: Port of London case study. Journal of Navigation, 67(2), 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463313000684
Sang, H., You, Y., Sun, X., Zhou, Y., & Liu, F. (2021). The hybrid path planning algorithm based on improved A* and artificial potential field for unmanned surface vehicle formations. Ocean Engineering, 223, 108709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108709
Sawada, R., Sato, K., & Majima, T. (2021). Automatic ship collision avoidance using deep reinforcement learning with LSTM in continuous action spaces. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 26(2), 509-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-020-00755-0
Silveira, P., Teixeira, A. P., & Guedes Soares, C. (2022). A method to extract the Quaternion Ship Domain parameters from AIS data. Ocean Engineering, 257, 111568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111568
Smierzchalski, R., & Michalewicz, Z. (2000). Modeling of ship trajectory in collision situations by an evolutionary algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 4(3), 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.873234
Szlapczynski, R. (2015). Evolutionary planning of safe ship tracks in restricted visibility. Journal of Navigation, 68(1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463314000587
Ugurlu, H., & Cicek, I. (2022). Analysis and assessment of ship collision accidents using fault tree and multiple correspondence analysis. Ocean Engineering, 245, 110514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110514
Wang, N. (2013). A novel analytical framework for dynamic quaternion ship domains. Journal of Navigation, 66(2), 265-281. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463312000483
Wang, N., Meng, X., Xu, Q., & Wang, Z. (2009). A unified analytical framework for ship domains. Journal of Navigation, 62(4), 643-655. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463309990178
Yoo, Y., & Lee, J. S. (2019). Evaluation of ship collision risk assessments using environmental stress and collision risk models. Ocean Engineering, 191, 106527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106527
Zeng, X. (2003). Evolution of the safe path for ship navigation. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 17(2), 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/713827101
Zhang, M., Montewka, J., Manderbacka, T., Kujala, P., & Hirdaris, S. (2021). A big data analytics method for the evaluation of ship: Ship collision risk reflecting hydrometeorological conditions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 213, 107674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107674
Zhang, W., Feng, X., Goerlandt, F., & Liu, Q. (2020). Towards a convolutional neural network model for classifying regional ship collision risk levels for waterway risk analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 204, 107127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107127
Zhang, Z., Zhao, H., Wang, J., & Wang, H. (2025). Efficient collaborative collision avoidance algorithm considering COLREGs in complex multi-ship encounter scenarios. Applied Ocean Research, 163, 104753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2025.104753
Zheng, K., Chen, Y., Jiang, Y., & Qiao, S. (2020). A SVM based ship collision risk assessment algorithm. Ocean Engineering, 202, 107062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107062
Zhou, W., Zheng, J., & Xiao, Y. (2022). An online identification approach for ship domain model based on AIS data. Plos One, 17(3), e0265266. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265266
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maritime Technology and Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
