Food Literacy of Public University Pre-Service Home Economics Teachers
Keywords:
Food Literacy, Pre-Service Home Economics TeachersAbstract
This research aimed to study the relationship among the knowledge, awareness, and practices on food literacy as shown among the public university pre-service home economics teachers. The sample group consisted of 330 samples. Stratified Random Sampling method was utilized to acquired sampling individuals who filled in online questionnaire, the tool for data collection. Selected statistical tools included the analysis of frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and Pearson’s Product Moment Correlation Coefficient. Collected data and statistical analysis indicated that 79.1 percent of the sample group had strong knowledge. The awareness of the studied sample was at the average level of 84.8, and their practice was at the high level of 68.2. The relationship among the knowledge, awareness and practices on food literacy was the statistically significant at the positive value of .001. This pointed out that once the students equipped with strong knowledge on food literacy, their practice went in line with the direction guide. The relationship of the knowledge and awareness on food literacy in correlation with the practice on food literacy was found positive at the significance of statistical level of .001. The analysis result indicated that well informed and positive awareness leaded to healthy practice based on their food literacy.
References
Charlebois, Music, & Faires. (2021). The Impact of COVID-19 on Canada’s Food Literacy: Results of a Cross-National Survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, 5485: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph18105485.
Karnjanapiboonwong, A., Kamwangsanga, P. & Kaewta, S. (2020). Situation Report of NCDs, Diabetes, High Blood Pressure and Related Risk Factors B.A. 2562. Retrieved from https://ddc.moph.go.th/uploads/publish/1035820201005073556.pdf/ [in Thai].
Krejcie, R., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement 30(3), 607-610. Cited in Gail, J. (2002). Research methods for public administrators. CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
Nagata, J. M., Ganson, K. T., Whittle, H. J., Chu, J., Harris, O. O., Tsai, A. C., & Weiser, S. D. (2019). Food Insufficiency and Mental Health in the U.S. During the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 60(4): 453-461.
Nerman, D. (2015). Food Education the Law in Japan. Retrieved Jan 8, 2022, Website: http://www.cbc.ca/news/ health/food-education-the-law-in-japan-1.2894279.
Pendergast, D., Garvis, S., & Kanasa, H. (2011). Insight from the Public on Home Economics and Formal Food literacy. Family & Consumer Science Research Journal 39(4), 415-430.
Pendergast, D., & Dewhurst, Y. (2012). Home Economics and Food Literacy – An International Iinvestigation. Retrieved April 20, 2018, http://www98.griffith. edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/49542/79938_1.pdf?sequence=1.
The Giessen Declaration. (2005). Public Health Nutrition. September 2005; 8(6A): 783-786.
Ukraisa, S. (2017). Food Literacy: New Paradigm and Approach to Develop Learning for Pre-Service Home Economics Teachers. Doctor of Philosophy (Population Education), Faculty of Graduate Studies, Mahidol University.
Ukraisa, S. (2020). Report of E-Learning for Food Literacy Learning Management. Faculty of Education, Kasetsart University. (Unpublished manuscript). [in Thai].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Kasetsart Educational Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความทุกบทความเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารคณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์ วิทยาเขตบางเขน
วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์ปริทัศน์ (Kasetsart Educational Review)