Working Motivation of Vocational Teachers in Bangkok

Authors

  • 1Lt. Hasanai Hatawong Department of Vocational Education, Faculty of Education, Kasetsart University
  • Pattarawat Jeerapattanatorn Department of Vocational Education, Faculty of Education, Kasetsart University

Keywords:

Motivation, Teacher Development, Vocational Teachers, Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory

Abstract

The objectives of this research were (1) to explore working motivation levels of vocational teachers in Bangkok, (2) to explore motivation factors that affected working motivation levels, and (3) to explore hygiene factors in vocational teachers’ working contexts. The researcher conceptualized Herzberg’s motivation theory in this study. The population were teachers connected with the Office of the Vocational Education Commission in Bangkok, total amount of 911. Sampling technique was convenient sampling, sample size is 278 people. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics such as frequency counts, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and simple regression analysis.  Results revealed that, overall mean of working motivation level was at ‘highest level’ (mean=4.33). When considering each item, ‘good perception towards career and work’ gained ‘highest mean’ (mean=4.46) while ‘happy moment in workplace’ gained ‘lowest mean’ (mean=4.16). For the questions regarding motivation factors showed that the overall mean of motivation factor was at ‘high level’ (mean=3.99). When considering each item, ‘achievement’ gained ‘highest mean’ (mean=4.16) while ‘advancement’ gained ‘lowest mean’ (mean=3.89). When exploring the relationship between motivation factors and working motivation levels, it was found that the relationship was at ‘low level’ (correlation coefficient =.215). The study towards hygiene factors showed the overall mean of hygiene factors was at ‘high level’ (mean=3.93). When considering each item, ‘status’ gained ‘highest mean’ (mean=4.17) while ‘supervision’ gained ‘lowest mean’ (mean=3.75). The study results brought about suggestions for the development of teachers’ advancement system, commitment to the good governance practices, as well as the creation of clear understanding about promotion process which will be an important part to solve problems and develop about vocational teachers’ working motivation.

References

Department of Religious Affairs. 2009. Royal Guidance of His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej on Religion and Morality. Bangkok: The Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand Limited Press.
Grey, R. et al. 2010. Happiness is Universal. Bangkok: Institute for Population and Social Reserch, Mahidol University. [in Thai]
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Synderman, B. 1959. The motivation to work (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Ministry of Education. 2013. Research results towards teachers' sufferings: The cause of despair (Online). www.moe.go.th, 14 January 2017. [in Thai]
_____. 2016. Education policy of the Cabinet (Online). www.moe.go.th, 5 February 2017. [in Thai]
_____. 2016. The 12th National Education Development Plan (B.E.2560-2564). Bangkok: Office of the Permanent Secretary Ministry of Education. [in Thai]
Mokkaranurak, D. 2011. The Scenario of Vocational Education in Thailand during the Next Decade (2011-2021). Doctor of Philosophy Thesis in Educational Administration, Khon Kaen Universty. [in Thai]
Office of the Civil Service Commission. 2017. Thailand in the Thailand 4.0 model under the Constitution of The Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2560 (Online). www.ocsc.go.th, 12 June 2017. [in Thai]
Office of the Education Council. 2015. Status of Teacher Education and Development in Thailand. Bangkok: Prikwarn Graphic Co., Ltd. [in Thai]
Palmer, P.J. 1998. The Courage to Teach. San Francisco: Jossy-Bass Publishers.
Pattaravanich, U., K. Subin, and A. Manawatthanawong. 2016. Balance of Teachers’ Happiness. Bangkok: Institute for Population and Social Reserch, Mahidol University. [in Thai]

Secretariat Office of the Teachers’ Council of Thailand. 2012. Professional Development Plan of Khurusapha (B.E. 2555-2559). Bangkok: Bonus Prepress Company Limited. [in Thai]
Sungthip, S. 2011. “Factors Affecting Happiness at Work of Teachers under the Office of Basic Education Commission: An Application of Structural Equation Model”. Online Journal of Education 6(1): 2563-2577. [in Thai]
Thailand Development Research Institute. 2011. Revamping Thai Education System: Quality for All. Bangkok: Thailand Development Research Institute. [in Thai]
_____. 2013. Developing Basic Education Reform Strategy for Responsibility. Bangkok: Office of the Basic Education Commission. [in Thai]
Wangthanomsak, M. 2007. The Model of Teachers’ Job Motivation. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis in Educational Administration, Silpakorn University. [in Thai]

Office of the Education Council. 2015. Status of Teacher Education and Development in Thailand. Bangkok: Prikwarn Graphic Co., Ltd. [in Thai]
Palmer, P.J. 1998. The Courage to Teach. San Francisco: Jossy-Bass Publishers.
Pattaravanich, U., K. Subin, and A. Manawatthanawong. 2016. Balance of Teachers’ Happiness. Bangkok: Institute for Population and Social Reserch, Mahidol University. [in Thai]

Secretariat Office of the Teachers’ Council of Thailand. 2012. Professional Development Plan of Khurusapha (B.E. 2555-2559). Bangkok: Bonus Prepress Company Limited. [in Thai]
Sungthip, S. 2011. “Factors Affecting Happiness at Work of Teachers under the Office of Basic Education Commission: An Application of Structural Equation Model”. Online Journal of Education 6(1): 2563-2577. [in Thai]
Thailand Development Research Institute. 2011. Revamping Thai Education System: Quality for All. Bangkok: Thailand Development Research Institute. [in Thai]
_____. 2013. Developing Basic Education Reform Strategy for Responsibility. Bangkok: Office of the Basic Education Commission. [in Thai]
Wangthanomsak, M. 2007. The Model of Teachers’ Job Motivation. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis in Educational Administration, Silpakorn University. [in Thai]

Downloads

Published

2020-10-29

Issue

Section

Research Article