Graduates’ Characteristics Based on Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education and Satisfaction Towards the Quality of Curriculum in Bachelor’s Degree of Education in Home Economics, Chiang Mai University
Keywords:
Thailand Qualifications Framework, Satisfaction, Quality of Curriculum, Home EconomicsAbstract
This research was aimed to 1) study graduates’ characteristics of Home Economics, Chiang Mai University based on Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education (TQF), and 2) study graduates’ satisfaction towards the quality of curriculum in Bachelor’s Degree of Education in Home Economics Program, Chiang Mai University. Population was 62 graduates who finished their studies in 2014-2017. Research tool was a survey form of graduates’ characteristics based on TQF and graduates’ satisfaction towards the quality of curriculum. Means and standard deviations were used to analyze data. The research findings showed that 1) graduates had characteristics in accordance with TQF in 6 indicators at a high level, and 2) graduates were satisfied with the quality of curriculum at a high level.
References
Bostock, S. & Baume, D. (2016). Professions and Professionalism in Teaching and Development. In D. Baume & C. Popovic (Eds.). Advancing Practice in Academic Development (pp. 32-51). New York: Routledge.
Boyle, B. & Charles, M. (2016). Curriculum Development. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.
Brandenburg, R., McDonough, S., Burke, J. & White, S. (2016). Teacher Education Research and the Policy Reform Agenda. In R. Brandenburg, S. McDonough, J. Burke & S. White (Eds.). Teacher Education: Innovation, Intervention and Impact (pp. 1-14). Singapore: Springer.
Elacqua, G. (2016). Building More Effective Education Systems. In S. Kuger, E. Klieme, N. Jude & D. Kaplan (Eds.). Assessing Contexts of Learning: An International Perspective (pp. 375-394). Singapore: Springer.
Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University. (2018). Vision, Mission, and Aims of Faculty. From http://www.edu.cmu.ac.th/viewdetail.php?cID=55 (1 August 2018).
Intasingh, S., Kontieng, S., Adipattaranan, N., Pankeaw, P., Assapaporn, Swathanan, S. & Kienngam, N. (2017). Criticizing Courses in the Master of Education Program in Curriculum, Teaching, and Learning Technology, Chiang Mai University by Using 3 Characteristics Framework. Kasetsart Educational Review, 32(1), 36-46. [in Thai].
Intasingh, S., Sirisawat, P., Chotivachira, B., Somnam, S., Kanchanaratchataphong, D. & Srinua, P. (2018). Students’ Satisfaction towards the Quality of Curriculum and Attitudes towards Teaching Profession of Pre-Service Teachers in Thai Major, Chiang Mai University. Kasetsart Educational Review, 33(1), 33-40. [in Thai].
Laveault, D. (2016). Building Capacity: Professional Development and Collaborative Learning About Assessment. In D. Laveault, & L. Allal (Eds.). Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation (pp. 131-143). Switzerland: Springer.
Leekitchwatana, P. (2014). Research Methods in Education. (10th ed.). Bangkok: Mean Service Supply. [in Thai].
Mercer, S. & Gkonou, C. (2017). Teaching with Heart and Soul. In T. S. Gregersen, & P. D. Maclntyre (Eds.). Innovative Practices in Language Teacher Education: Spanning the Spectrum from Intra to Inter-Personal Professional Development (pp. 103-124). Switzerland: Springer.
Office of the Higher Education Commission. (2017). Guideline for Internal Educational Quality Assurance in the Higher Education 2014. (3rd ed.). Bangkok: Parppim. [in Thai].
Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2014). Curriculum Foundations, Principles, and Issues. (6th ed). USA: Pearson Education Limited.
Samuttai, R. (2015). Research for Learning Development. Chiang Mai: Krongchang Printing. [in Thai].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
บทความทุกบทความเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารคณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์ วิทยาเขตบางเขน
วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์ปริทัศน์ (Kasetsart Educational Review)
