How to Improve a Lesson Design in STAR STEMS “A Chemical Free Life” Evaluated by Matthayomsuksa 6 Students at Panyaworakun School

Authors

  • Thoseporn Sophitthammakun Panyaworakun School

Keywords:

STAR STEMS, 5 Variations

Abstract

          The purposes of this research were to evaluate how to improve a lesson in STAR STEMS “A Chemical Free Life” by the Panyaworakun School students according to assessment for learning with 5 variations.

          The subjects of this study were 56 high-school students of Matthayomsuksa 6/1, 6/4, and 6/7 at Panyaworakun School in the academic year 2017, semester 1. The research instrument was a questionnaire regarding STAR STEM Evaluation Form Learning Plan 1 “A Chemical Free Life.” The data of the questionnaire were analyzed by means of frequency and percentage, with being above 60% of a number of students for the passing criterion. The data were analyzed again with assessment for learning with 5 variations to develop a further lesson design for a variety of the students’ learning.

          The research results revealed that the learning plan is essentialism and the lesson is much more likely to be cognition-based and matches with visual and passive learners. This learning plan is not the plan for student-centered learning. Therefore, Situation-Based Learning: SBL doesn’t appear in this lesson. Additionally, to improve the lesson, Who Assesses, Where to Assess, and When to Assess should have a variety of assessment methods. In Who Assesses, not only is student self-assessment utilized, but teacher assessment and peer assessment should be also employed. Where to Assess can have a variety of places for assessing, for example, schools, homes, learning centers, and relevant places. In terms of When to Assess, a pre-test should be supplemented as a sort of pre-learning.

References

References

Cunningham, S. & Moor, P. (2010). Real Life Intermediate Students’ Book. Harlow: Pearson
Education Limited.

Dechakupt, P., & Yindeesuk, P. (2014). Learning Management in the 21st Century. Bangkok:
Chulalongkorn University Printing House. [in Thai]

Educational System Reform Steering Subcommittee in Educational System Reform Steering
Committee in Committee for Steering National Reform of Education, National Reform
Steering Assembly. (2017). An Approach for the Use of Cultivating “Good Citizens and
Disciplines” Being Good People, Have Disciplines, Be Proud of the Nation, Be Skilled
According to Aptitude, And Being Responsible for Families, Communities, Societies, and
the Nation, with Learning Management Model “STAR STEMS” (3rd impression).
Nonthaburi: P&P Printing Prepress. [in Thai]

Kha-on, W. (2017). Enhancing Communication Skills of Prathomsuksa 4 Students Using
Situation-Based Learning. Master of Education thesis in Curriculum and Instruction,
Dhurakij Pundit University. [in Thai]

Numkanisorn, P. (2018). Thai learners’ Skills in the 21st Century. Kasetsart Educational
Review, 33 (1), 59-68. [in Thai]

Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2008). Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551
(A.D. 2008). Bangkok: Ministry of Education.

Sivaraksa, S. (2002). Educational Philosophy (2nd ed.). Bangkok: Foundation For Children
(FFC) Publishing House. [in Thai]

Wangaard, D.B., Elias, M.J. & Fink, K. (2014). Educating the Head, Heart and Hand for the 21st
Century. Retrieved from: http://www.seenmagazine.us/Articles/Article-Detail/ArticleId/
4140/EDUCATING-THE-HEAD-HEART-AND-HAND-FOR-THE-21st-CENTURY.

Downloads

Published

2019-01-01