The Effects of 5E Inquiry Learning Management Together with KWL Plus Technique on Science Learning Achievement and Analytical Thinking Ability of Prathom Suksa II Students at the Group of Phachiraphipat School in Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Province

Authors

  • ๋Jenjira Khumdee Department of Education, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University
  • Nuanjid Chaowakeratipong Department of Education, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University
  • Suchin Visavateeranon Department of Education, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University

Keywords:

5E Inquiry Learning Management, KWL Plus Technique, Science Learning Achievement, Analytical Thinking Ability,, Primary Education

Abstract

The purposes of this research were to (1) compare science learning achievement of Prathom Suksa II students who learned with  the 5E inquiry learning management together with KWL Plus Technique with 75 percent criterion; and (2) compare the pre-learning and post-learning analytical thinking ability of Prathom Suksa II students who learned with the 5E inquiry learning management together with KWL Plus Technique.

The research sample consisted of 14 Prathom Suksa II students in one intact classroom at the group of Phachiraphipat School, obtained by cluster random sampling. The research instruments were learning management plans on the topic of the Materials around us under the 5E inquiry learning management together with KWL Plus Technique, a science learning achievement test on the topic of the Materials around us, and an analytical thinking ability test. Statistics employed for data analysis were the percentage, mean, standard deviation, and Sign test.

The research findings were that (1) the post-learning of science learning achievement of Prathom Suksa II students learning under the 5E inquiry learning management together with KWL Plus Technique were significantly higher than 75 percent criterion at the .05 level of significance; and (2) the post-learning of analytical thinking ability scores of Prathom Suksa II students who learned under the 5E inquiry learning management together with KWL Plus Technique were significantly higher than before learning at the .05 level of significance.

 

 

References

Carin, A. and Sund, R. (1975). Teaching science through discovery. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill.

Carr, E. and Ogle, D. (1987). K-W-L Plus: A strategy for Comprehension and Summarization. Journal of Reading, 30 (April 1987), 626-631.

Chaowakeratipong, N. (2014). Definition and scope of analytical thinking. in Paitoon Sinlarat (Editor), Analytical thinking: how to teach and create (pages 8-17). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing Press. [in Thai]

Chindanuruk, T. (2014). Assessment of analytical thinking. in Paitoon Sinlarat (Editor), Analytical thinking: how to teach and create (pages 42-55). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing Press. [in Thai]

Kanchanarukphong, S. (2006). Techniques for organizing 5E learning activities that focus on developing advanced thinking skills: Learning Area of Science. Bangkok: Tarn aksorn. [in Thai]

Khemmani, T. (2016). Teaching science: knowledge for organizing effective learning processes. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing Press. [in Thai]

Laowreandee, W. (2013). Thinking skills instruction models and stratrgies. Nakhon Pathom: Faculty of Education Silpakorn University Sanamchan Palace Campus. [in Thai]

Lindratanasirikul, K. (2017). Research tools and quality inspection. In Academic department publisher (Editor ), Research in Curriculum and Instruction Unit 8-11 (pages 1-82). Nonthaburi: Department of Education Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. [in Thai]

Ministry of Education (MOE). (2008). The Basic Education Core Curriculum, BE 2008. Bangkok: Teachers Council of Ladprao. [in Thai]

Ministry of Education (MOE).(2017). Learning standards and indicators for learning mathematics Science and Geography In the group of learning, social studies, religion and culture (Revised version 2017) according to the core curriculum of basic education, BE 2008. Bangkok: Teachers Council of Ladprao. [in Thai]

Sinlarat, P. (2014). Importance and necessity of analytical thinking. In Paitoon Sinlarat (Editor), Analytical thinking: how to teach and create (pages 1-7). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing Press. [in Thai]

Sinthaphanon, S. (2015). Learning management of modern teachers To develop skills of learners in the 21st century. Bangkok: 9119 Limited Partnership Technical Printing. [in Thai]

Sintoovongse, K. and Visavateeranon, S. (2014). Psychological basis of science teaching. In Academic department publisher (Editor), Foundations Methodologiesand Nature of Science Education Unit 6-10 (pages 1-140). Nonthaburi: Department of Education Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. [in Thai]

Tejagupta, C. (2012). Child Development Psychology. In Academic department publisher (Editor), Phychology and learning methodology Unit 1-7 (pages 1-46). Nonthaburi: Department of Education Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. [in Thai]

The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST). (2018). What are the implications of scientific knowledge from PISA. FOCUS issues from PISA. from https://pisathailand.ipst.ac.th/issue-2018-30/. [in Thai]

Yok-ubon, N. (2012). How to think through a scientific mind. Nonthaburi: Bookpoint. [in Thai]

Downloads

Published

2019-12-30