Teaching the Equilibrium Topic in Physics Using STEAM Education Integrated Scientific Argumentation
Keywords:
STEAM Education, Argumentation, Physics, EquilibriumAbstract
This article aims to review, analyze and synthesize the literature related to the Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Mathematics (STEAM) education as well as scientific argumentation. From analysis, the authors synthesized the STEAM integrated Scientific Argumentation (STEAM-SA) teaching steps that were consisted of six teaching steps as: 1) Inspiration build, 2) Problem selection and boundary identification, 3) Data collection, 4) Product creation and art integration, 5) Presentation, and 6) Evaluation. Throughout these steps, scientific argumentation is well-integrated. At the end, the authors raised one example of lesson plan applied the STEAM-SA teaching in the Equilibrium topic in physics for Grade 10 students. This example may initiate other teachers’ idea in application of STEAM-SA in other subjects or topics they plan to teach.
References
Anupap Puangsomchit. (2016). The development of grade 10 students argumentation skills on biomolecule through context-based learning activities. Science Education Program, Department of Education, Faculty of Education, Kasetsart University. Bangkok. (in Thai)
Asawin Thanapud, Sasithep Pitiporntapin, Pattanee Jantrarotai. (2015). Development of grade 10th students’ argumentation skills in natural resources unit using socioscienctific issues teaching. 34th The Graduate Research Conference. (P. 1697- 1707). (in Thai)
Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2008). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Journal of science education 2009, 93(1), 26-37.
Besnard, P., & Hunter, A. (2008). Argumentation based on classical logic. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226226985_Argumentation_Based_on_Classical_Logic
Chatree Faikhamta. (2018). Science classroom culture of thai students. Journal of Education, 19(1), 43-53. (in Thai)
Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2009). High-school students’ informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy? The international journal of science education, 31(11), 1421-1445.
Faikhamta, C., & Ladachat, L. (2016). Science education in thailand: Moving through crisis to opportunity. In Chiu, Mei-Hung (Ed.). Science Education Research and Practice in Asia, 197-214.
Foong, C.-C., & Daniel, E. G. S. (2013). Students' argumentation skills across two socio-scientific issues in a confucian classroom: Is transfer possible? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 35(14), 2331-2355.
Ge, X., Ifenthaler, D., & Spector, J. M. E. (2015). Emerging technologies for steam education: full STEAM aheade merging technologies for STEAM education: Full STEAM ahead. New York: Springer.
Hilburn, A. (2011). What is STEAM? Retrieved from http://www.hilburnacademy.net/what- issteam. html
Hornga, R.-Y., Lua, P.-H., Chenb, P.-H., & Houb, S.-H. (2013). The effects of argument stance on scientific knowledge inquiry skills. International Journal of Science Education, 35(16), 2784-2800.
Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST). (2014). Introduction of STEM Education. Retrieved from https://www.scimath.org/stem. (in Thai)
Jiraporn Khummanee.(2018). Development STEAM gamification for vocational innovators’ creativity and innovation skills. UMT Poly Journal, 5(2), 164. (in Thai)
Kochakorn Pinitmontree. (2018). The development of instructional model steam education for the enhancement of 21st century living skills for Mathayomsuksa 1. Retrieved from http://1.10.168.203/UserFiles/File/UDON3_20180702113631.pdf (in Thai)
Kriangkrai Palasonthi. (2016) Development of STEAM cloud-based learning model using augmented reality to develop undergraduate students’ creativity and innovation skill. Master Degree Thesis in Information and Communication Technology for Education. King Mongkut's University Of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok. (in Thai)
Krismant Whattananarong. (2014). Teaching for diversity among conflicts Part 3: Students and teachers and symbolic protests. Retrieved from https://www.thairath.co.th/ content/399001. (in Thai)
Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74(5), 1245-1260.
Kwon, S. B., Nam, D.-S., & Lee, T. W. (2011). The effects of convergence education based steam on elementary school students' creative personality. The 19th International conference on Computers in Education.
Lenare Gazo. (2018). Kids must 'argue' creatively to understand themselves and others. Retrieved from https://thepotential.org/ 2018/11/15/arguing-with-children/ (in Thai)
Lertnaree Rodkumnerd. (2015). The effects of project approach experience provision based on STEAM education approach with using learning local resources in samut songkhram province on preschool children’s understanding concepts of science. Master Thesis in Early Childhood Education. Kasetsart University. Bangkok. (in Thai)
Lin, S. S., & Mintzes, J. J. (2010). Learning Argumentation skills through instruction in sosioscientific issue : The effect of ability level. International Journal of Science and mathematics Education, 8, 993-1017.
Llewellyn, D., & Rajesh, H. (2011). Fostering argumentation skills: Doing what real scientists really do. Science Scope, 35(1), 22-28.
Mintra Krapaothong (2018). Construction of STEAM education packages for development learning achiviment and creative thinking for grade 10. Master Degree Thesis in Science Education, Nakhon Sawan Rajabhat University . (In Thai)
Natdanai Niamthong. (2018). Form STEM to STEAM. Retrieved from https://www.scimath.org/article-stem/item/7812-stem-steam. (in Thai)
Nattapathu Sermsuk. (2015). The development argumentation skills grade 10 Students’ of ecosystem-based content Scientific through socio-scientific Issue-based Teaching. Master Degree Thesis in Science Education, Kasetsart University. Bangkok. (in Thai)
National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for k–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576.
Nipon Janlen. (2014). Inquiry will be diminished. The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST), 42(168), 6-9. (in Thai)
Nguyen, T. P. L., Nguyen, T. H., & Tran, T. K. (2020). STEM education in secondary schools: teachers’ perspective towards sustainable development. Sustainability, 12, 1-16.
Office of the Education Council (ONEC). (2017). National Education Plan (2017-2036). Bangkok: Prik Hwan Graphic. (in Thai)
Office of National Economic and Social Development Council. (2017). The 12th National Economic and Social Development Plan (2017-2021). Bangkok : Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council (NESDC). (in Thai)
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2004). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Dillon Beach, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Phatthanawong Dokmai. (2012). Comparisons of effects of learning socio-scientific issue using the mixed method and the conventional learning method on argumentation and reasoning thinking of grade 11 students with different physics results. Master Degree Thesis in Science Education. Mahasakham University. (in Thai)
Phinyo wongthong. (2019). Effect of integrated learning activities based on STEAM education on science learning achievement, critical thinking skills and students’ satisfaction of grade4 students. J. Res. Unit Sci. Technol. Environ. Learning, 10(1). (in Thai)
Pornpimon Kongcharoensuk. (2018).Effects of using learning ctclel approach intergrated with science argumentation on the informal resoning ability, Biology achievement, and biology concepts of matayomsuksa four students. Master Degree Thesis in Science teaching, Burapha University, Faculty of Education. (in Thai)
Porntip Siripatrachai.(2013). STEM education and 21st century skills development. Executive Journal, 33(2), 49-56. (in Thai)
Riley, S. (2014). How to STEAM: The STEAM Process. Retrieved from https://educationcloset.com/ steam/How-to-steam/
Riley, S. (2016). 6 Steps to create a STEAM classroom. Retrieved from 16 th September 2016 https://educationcloset.com/2016/02/25/6-steps-to-creating-a-steam-centered-classroom/
Rufo, D. (2013). STEAM with a capital A: Learning frenzy. The STEAM Journal, 1(1), 25.
Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations. Science Education, 89(1), 71-93.
Somrak Intavimolsri. (2017). Effect of using STEAM education approach in biology on scientific creativity and learning achievement of tenth grade students. Master Degree Thesis in in Science Education, Chulalongkorn University. (in Thai)
Sunee Hemaprasit. (2011). Examples of learning units in elementary level. Bangkok. (in Thai)
Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Yakman, G. g. (2008). STΣAM Education: An overview of creating a model of integrative education. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/8113795/STEAM_Education_an_overview_of_creating_a_model_of_integrative_education
Yotsawee Saifah. (2014). STEM learning concept. Bangkok: Teaching Materials of Elementary Education, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Kasetsart Educational Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความทุกบทความเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารคณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์ วิทยาเขตบางเขน
วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์ปริทัศน์ (Kasetsart Educational Review)
