The Development of Scientific Explanation Ability and Learning Achievement Using Model-Based Learning in the Topic of Phenomena and Global Changes of Prathom Suksa VI Students at Wat Samnakbok School Chonburi Province
Keywords:
Model-Based Learning, Scientific Explanation Ability, Learning Achievement, Best practice of Model-Based LearningAbstract
The purpose of this action research were: to develop the scientific explanation ability and learning achievement and to study of the best practices in learning management using a model-based on the topic of Phenomena and Global Changes of Prathom Suksa VI. The research sample consisted of 21 Prathom Suksa VI students studying in the first semester of the academic year 2020 at Wat Samnakbok School, Chonburi province, obtained by purposive sampling. Data were gathered by a scientific explanation of ability assessment form, a learning achievement test, teacher’s reflective journal and student worksheets. Data were analyzed using content analysis, frequency percentage and normalized gain. The results of this research showed that 1) in the pre-learning, 21 (100.00 percent) students’ scientific explanation ability was at an improvement level while in the post-learning, students developed their scientific explanation ability as follows: 7 students (33.33 percent) were at a good level, 13 students (61.19 percent) were at a moderate level, and 1 student (4.76 percent) was at an improvement level; 2) The students’ post-learning achievement was higher than the pre-learning counterpart, and the class normalized gain was at the medium level with <g> = 0.37; 3) The best practices in learning management using a model-based to help develop the scientific explanation ability were: (1) clarifying the elements of scientific explanation encouraging the writing of scientific explanations after a scientific inquiry; (2) writing an empirical concept map enabling students to select the appropriate information for writing scientific explanations; and (3) presenting and discussing issues encouraging more appropriate writing of student claims.
References
Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26-55.
Buckley, B. C., Gobert, J. D., Kindfield, A. C., Horwitz, P., Tinker, R. F., Gerlits, B., . . . Willett, J. (2004). Model-based teaching and learning with BioLogica™: What do they learn? How do they learn? How do we know? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 23-41.
Chaowakeratipong, N. (2019). A set of exercises to design activities and write a science lesson plan by using a scientific investigation and explanation process. Nonthaburi: Department of Education, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. [in Thai].
Coll, R. K. (2008). Chemistry Learners' Preferred Mental Models for Chemical Bonding. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 5(1), 23-48.
Gobert, J. D., & Buckley, B. C. (2002). Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education. International Journal of Science Education. 22(9), 891-894
Kemmis, S., & R. McTaggart. (1998). The Action Research Planner. Geelong. Victoria:Deakin University Press.
Klaynin, S. (2012). Thai Science Education: Development and Stability. Samut Prakan: Advance Printing Service. [in Thai].
Maia, P. F., & Justi, R. (2009). Learning of chemical equilibrium through modelling-based teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 603-630.
McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanation through generic versus context-specific written scaffolds. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April, 2006.
McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers' instructional practices on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 53-78.
Meela, P., & Artdej, R. (2017). Model Based Inquiry And Scientific Explanation: Promoting Meaning-Making In Classroom. Journal of Education Naresuan University 19(3), 1-15. [in Thai].
Peker, D., & Wallace, C. S. (2011). Characterizing high school students’ written explanations in biology laboratories. Research in Science Education, 41(2), 169-191.
Pinitmontree, T. (2018). Learning Inventory Using Model-Based Learning Approach for Increasing Critical Thinking and Learning Achievements on "The Earth and Changing" for the 8th Grade Level. (Degree of Master of Education Unpublished). Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University, Maha Sarakham. [in Thai].
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M., Tsai, S. P., & Schneider, J. (2010). Testing one premise of scientific inquiry in science classrooms: Examining students' scientific explanations and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 583-608.
Rungpranomkorn, R. (2015). The Effects of Using Model-Based Learning in the Topic of Force and Motion to Develop Science Learning Achievement and Science Process Skills of Prathom Suksa V Students in Mae La Noi Educational Development Network, Mae Hong Son Province. (Degree of Master of Education Unpublished). Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, Nonthaburi. [in Thai].
Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., . . ., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632-654.
Senisrisakul, U. (2018). National Basic Education Test Report (O-NET) Science Education Prathom Suksa VI Academic Year 2018. Chonburi: Wat samnakbok School. [in Thai].
Supatchaiyawong, P., Faikhamta, C., & Suwanruji, P. (2015). Using Model-Based Learning for Enhancing Mental Model of Atomic Structure and Understandings of the Nature of Model of 10th Grade Students. Walailak Journal of Learning Innovations, 1(1), 97-124. [in Thai].
The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology: IPST. (2013). Preliminary Analysis Report for PISA 2012. Bangkok. [in Thai].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Kasetsart Educational Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความทุกบทความเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารคณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์ วิทยาเขตบางเขน
วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์ปริทัศน์ (Kasetsart Educational Review)