Best Practices for Science Drama Integrated with ICT Tools Teaching in the unit of Genetics to Enhance Grade 10 Students’ Science Communication Skill
Keywords:
Science Drama Integrated with ICT Tools Teaching, Science Communication Skill, GeneticsAbstract
This classroom action research aimed of the best practices for science drama integrated with ICT tools teaching to enhance grade 10 students’ science communication skill. The participants selected by purposive selection were 32 students in grade 10 in Mathematics-Science Programme in the second semester of the academic year 2021. Researcher collected data from my journal entries after learning management, students’ reflective journals, semi, and evaluation forms of students’ science communication skill. Qualitative data were analyzed by inductive analysis. The research suggested that the best practices for science drama integrated with ICT tools teaching to enhance grade 10 students’ science communication skill were 1) The use of innovative news and articles for asking questions and discussions in breakout rooms on application Zoom, along with Google slide-based knowledge summaries, stimulates interest and promote the production of science dramas to communicate in a variety of contexts. 2) Providing keywords and writing the Freytag's pyramid before the play determines the boundaries of the content and helps to verify the correctness, completeness, and ordering of the content and 3) Criticism of the work with constructive questions, along with direct feedback after the play, helps to complement the authenticity of the content, presenting representations and obtaining guidelines for the development of works with goals.
References
Abed, O.H. (2016). Drama-Based Science Teaching and Its Effect on Students' Understanding of Scientific Concepts and Their Attitudes towards Science Learning. International education studies, 9(10), 163-173.
Atjanawat, T. (2015). Development of science communication and teamwork abilities of eleventh grade students using group investigation (master’s thesis). http://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/51076. [in Thai].
Baldwin, P., & Fleming, K. (2003). Teaching literacy through drama: Creative approaches: Routledge.
Battelle for Kids (2007). P21 framework definition. http://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21/frameworks-resources.
Bowater, L., & Yeoman, K.. (2013). Science communication: a practical guide for scientists. In. https://books.google.co.th/books?id=UGYe300kyXUC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false
Cahill, H. (2013). Drama for health and human relationships education: aligning purpose and design. In M. Anderson & J. Dunn (Eds.). How drama Activates learning (178-193). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Chamrat, S. (2020). Technology integrated learning. Bangkok: Fastbooks. [in thai].
Chang, H. P., Chen, C. C., Guo, G. J., Cheng, Y. J., Lin, C. Y. & Jen, T. H. (2011). The development of a competence scale for learning science: Inquiry and communication. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1213-1233.
Cheevakul, K. (2019). Developing science communication skill of grade 11 students through socio-scientific issues-based teaching integrated ICT tools (master’s thesis). https://portal.lib.ku.ac.th/login?url=https://www.lib.ku.ac.th/KUthesis/2562/kamonchanok-che-all.pdf. [in Thai].
Chung, Y., Yoo, J., Kim, S.W., Lee, H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2016). Enhancing students’ communication skills in the science classroom through socioscientific Issues. International journal of science and mathematics education, 14(1), 1-27.
Davies, Sarah R, & Horst, Maja. (2016). Science communication: culture, identity and citizenship: Springer.
De Beer, J., Petersen, N., & Brits, S. (2018). The use of puppetry and drama in the biology classroom. The American Biology Teacher, 80(3), 175-181.
Jungwiwattanaporn, P. (2003). Creative drama using to develop learners. Bangkok, Thailand: Prik-Wan Graphic. http://backoffice.onec.go.th/uploads/Book/944-file.pdf. [in thai].
Kemmis, Stephen, & McTaggart, Robert. (1988). The action research reader. Geelong. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
Ketsing, J. (2022). Science classroom action research: A learning pathway for improving you. Bangkok: Fastbooks. [in thai].
Khemkong, S. (2017). The development of grade 11th student' Scientific reasoning ability by using inquiry-based learning. (master’s thesis). https://portal.lib.ku.ac.th/login?url= https://www.lib.ku.ac.th/KUthesis/2560/sirinoot-khe-all.pdf. [in Thai].
Kulgemeyer, Christoph, & Schecker, Horst. (2013). Students Explaining Science—Assessment of Science Communication Competence. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2235-2256.
Malmfors, B., Garnsworthy, P., & Grossman, M. (2003). Writing and presenting scientific papers: Nottingham University Press.
Ministry of Education. (2017). Indicators and core learning content Science learning subject group
(Revised Edition C.E. 2017) according to the Core Curriculum of Basic Education C.E. 2008: The Agricultural Co-operative Federation of Thailand. [in thai].
Pitiporntapin, S. (2014). Science and communication. Bangkok: April rain printing. [in thai].
Pongsophon, P., Yutakom, N., & Boujaoude, S.B. (2010). Promotion of scientific literacy on global warming by process drama. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1-37.
Pongvora, S. (2008). Science drama with teaching science. IPST Magazine, 36(155), 82-84. [in thai].
Reunkampang, M. (2022). Science communication ability of grade 8 students learning through think pair share activity. Journal of Panya, 29(1), 85-97. [in Thai].
Saka, Arzu, Ebenezer, Jazlin, Çakır, Ilknur, & Saka, Ahmet Zeki. (2016). Pedagogy of creative drama in biology. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 4(03), 187.
Singnoi, W. (2017). 21st century learning skills of student. IPST Magazine, 45(208), 31-33. [in thai].
Sueangam, K. & Srisukvatananan, P. (2021). A development of on-task behavior in an inclusive classroom by using positive classroom management. Journal of Research and Development in Special Education, 10(2), 69-81. [in Thai].
Suwannawong, N. (2010). Dramatized experience for promoting scientific literacy on global warming. (master’s thesis). https://portal.lib.ku.ac.th/login?url= https://www.lib.ku.ac.th/KUthesis/2553/nanthiya-suw/index.html. [in Thai].
Teachakaew, S., Kijkuakul, S. & Booncham, U. (2020). Develop flipped classroom for encourage science communication skills in nervous system and structure and movement system. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 22(1), 262-272. [in Thai].
Treise, D. & Weigold, M.F. (2002). Advancing science communication: A survey of science communicators. Science Communication, 23(3), 310-322.
Warner, C.D. (2013). Drama and science: an unlikely partnership for inquiry. In M. Anderson & J. Dunn (Eds.). How drama Activates learning. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Worakitchanon, Y. (2020). The development of 11th grade students’ science communication skill in the unit of digestive system using model-based inquiry teaching. (master’s thesis). [in Thai].
Yoon, H. G., Na, J. Y. & Jang, B. G. (2004). Case study on science drama in elementary school. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(5), 902-915.
Yoon, H. G. (2006). The nature of science drama in science education. Paper presented at the 9th international conference on public communication of science and technology (PCST-9). Seoul, Korea.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Kasetsart Educational Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความทุกบทความเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารคณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์ วิทยาเขตบางเขน
วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์ปริทัศน์ (Kasetsart Educational Review)
