Family Literacy of State Autonomous University Student, Bangkok
Keywords:
Literacy, Family Literacy, StudentAbstract
The purposes of this study were to: 1) study the level of Family Literacy of Students and 2) compare the Family Literacy of State Autonomous University Students, Bangkok. The sample group in this study was 400 undergraduate students at state-autonomous Universities, Bangkok, using a multi-stage random sampling method. Questionnaires were the instrument for collecting data. The statistics used frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and analysis of differences by independent sample t-test and One-way ANOVA.
The study's results were as follows:
1. The overall average level of Family Literacy was high, and every aspect had an overall average level at a high degree. Among these aspects, the highest average level was in the knowledge of Technological Changes, followed by Engagement in Activities with Changes in Social and Cultural aspects, and Family and Community.
2. The results of comparing. In terms of overall Family Literacy, it was found that the fathers' self-employed/farmers, family incomes, year levels, and family members were different at a statistically significant level at .001, .01 and .05, Plus, Students' gender, academic disciplines, residential location, mothers' occupations, fathers' educational levels, and mothers' educational levels did not reveal differences at statistically significant in Family Literacy.
References
Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2005). Research in Education (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Company.
Burke, J., & Larry, C. (2004). Educational Research (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
Chompikul, J. and et al. (2009). Relationship in Thai Families. ASEAN Institute for Health Development. [In Thai]
Chotrakul, S. (2016). Digital Literacy, Digital Natives and Famity. Journal of Management Science Chiangrai Rajabhat University, 11(1). 99-118. [In Thai]
Department of Women's Affairs and Family Development. (2011). Family Life. (7th ed.). Office of Welfare Promotion Commission for Teachers and Educational Personnel. [In Thai]
Inthanon, S. (2020). DQ Digital Intelligence. (3rd ed.). Child and Youth Media Institute. [In Thai]
Kanjanakuntorn, P. & Chaicmporn, S. (2019). Thai Family Relation Models in the Globalization Era. Journal of Social Development, 21(2). 164-175. [In Thai]
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 608.
Leekitwattana, P. (2016). Education Reaearch methodology. (11th ed.). King Mongkutis Institue of Technology Ladkrabang. [In Thai]
Office of the Permanent Secretary. (2022). Number of Students at public Universities. www.info.mua.go.th/info/table_stat_02.php?id_member=. [In Thai]
Payne, D. (2003). Applied Educational Assessment (2nd ed.). Nelson Thomson Learning.
Phonok, C. (2018, 5 Dec.). Family Literacy. Daily News, 25. [In Thai]
Piromkaew, S. (2010). Man and Society. (7th ed.). Kasetsart University. [In Thai]
Poovorawan, Y. (2021). New Normal Life. https://learningdq-dc.ku.ac.th/course/?c=1&l=5. [In Thai]
Roopleam, T. (2017). Development of Digital Intelligence Quotient program for ele mentary School Students. Master of Education. Educational Research and Evaluation. Mahasarakham University. [In Thai]
Royal Society. (2019). Dictionary of Contemporary Educational Termionology (Literacy). Office of the Royal Society. [In Thai]
Rungthongbaisuree, S. (2015). Research Reprts Study of tamily Relationships Pornthisan Village Pathum Thani. Pathum Thani: Rajamangala University of Technolody Thanyburi. [In Thai]
Rungthongbaisuree, S. (2017). Students’ Behaviors in Families. Journal of Liberal Arts Rmutt, 1(2). 13-20. [In Thai]
Sacchanand, C. (2020). Information Literacy in the Digital Environment. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 46(1). 1-17. [In Thai]
Singlumpong, O. (2018). Cultural Transmission through the Narration of Indian Drama Series: Siya ke Ram. Dhurakij Pundit Communi cation Arts Journal, 12(1), 259-301. [In Thai]
Tangthianrat, Y. (2014). Man and Society. (15th ed.). Bangkok University. [In Thai]
Trisri, S. (2018). Study of Cultural Intlligence and Other Factors Affecting the Cultural Intelligence of Undergraduate Studets. Dissertation Ph.D. Applied Behavioral Science Research. Srinakharinwirot University. [In Thai]
Turner, R., & Carlson, L. (2003). Indexes of item-objective Congruence for Multiplied Dimensions items. International Journal of Testing, 3(2), 163-171.
Vadeesirisak, S. and et al. (2012). The Model of Cultural Intlligence Development to Build Leadership among the Business Organizations in Thailand. Doctor of Philosophy. Innovative Science Communication Management. Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat University. [In Thai]
Wangaeo, S. (2008). Society and Culture. (11th ed.). Chulalongkorn University Press. [In Thai]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Kasetsart Educational Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความทุกบทความเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารคณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์ วิทยาเขตบางเขน
วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์ปริทัศน์ (Kasetsart Educational Review)
