The Development of Cooperative Learning Activities With Group Investigation Technique and Generative AI to Enhance Ninth-Grade Students’ Ability to Analyze Historical Causes and Consequences
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this research were to 1) develop cooperative learning activities using group investigation technique and generative AI, to ensure appropriate quality and achieve effectiveness based on the 80/80 criterion, 2) compare students’ ability to analyze historical causes and consequences before and after the learning activities, 3) compare students’ learning achievement before and after the learning activities, and 4) examine students’ satisfaction in the learning activities. The sample consisted of 36 ninth-grade students Matthayombanbangkapi School, selected by simple random sampling. The research instruments included 1) lesson plans, 2) a test of students’ ability to analyze historical causes and consequences, 3) an achievement test, and 4) a satisfaction questionnaire. The statistical methods used for data analysis were mean, standard deviation, percentage, and t-test dependent. The results were as follows: 1) the developed cooperative learning activities with group investigation and generative AI were rated as the most appropriate (M = 4.56, SD = 0.60), with efficiency scores (E1/E2) of 80.97/81.30, which met the established criterion; 2) students’ ability to analyze historical causes and consequences after the learning activities was significantly higher than that before the learning activities, at the .01 significance level; 3) students’ learning achievement after the learning activities was significantly higher than that before the learning activities, at the .01 significance level; and 4) students’ satisfaction towards learning activities was at the highest level (M = 4.62, SD = 0.53). The findings indicated that all four research objectives were successfully achieved, demonstrating that the developed learning activities can be effectively implemented.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Journal of Information and Learning is operated by the Office of Academic Resources, Prince of Songkla University. All articles published in the journal are protected by Thailand copyright law. This copyright covers the exclusive rights to share, reproduce and distribute the article, including in electronic forms, reprints, translations, photographic reproductions, or similar. Authors own copyrights in the works they have created as well as the Office of Academic Resources. The Journal reserves the right to edit the language of papers accepted for publication for clarity and correctness, as well as to make formal changes to ensure compliance with the journal's guidelines. All authors must take public responsibility for the content of their paper.
References
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Farrelly, T., & Baker, N. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence: Implications and considerations for higher education practice. Education Sciences, 13(11), Article 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111109
Grimes, M., Von Krogh, G., Feuerriegel, S., Rink, F., & Gruber, M. (2023). From scarcity to abundance: Scholars and scholarship in an age of generative artificial intelligence. Academy of Management Journal, 66(6), 1617–1624. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2023.4006
Gyimah, G. (2023). Effectiveness of group investigation versus lecture-based instruction on students’ concept mastery and transfer in social studies. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 47(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2022.05.001
Kaewpuang, P. (2018). Historical thinking: Social studies pre-service teachers’ key skills. HUSO Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 68–90. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/husojournalpnru/article/view/245646
Kammanee, T. (2024). Sāt kānsō̜n: ʻOngkhwāmrū phư̄a kānčhat krabūankānrīanrū thī mī prasitthiphāp (23rd ed.) [Teaching science: Knowledge for organizing effective learning processes]. Chulalongkorn University.
Kindenberg, B. (2024). ChatGPT-generated and student-written historical narratives: A comparative analysis. Education Sciences, 14(5), Article 530. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050530
Mahji, S., Kotcharat, J., & Boonprakarn, K. (2020). Situations and problems in learning history lesson for grade 4 students in private schools under the office of Huasai district education, Nakhon Si Thammarat province [Conference presentation]. The 11th Hatyai National and International Conference. Songkhla, Thailand. https://www.hu.ac.th/conference/proceedings2020/doc/G3/G3-39-179Ed-OP_สุไรยา%20%20%20หมะจิ%20(P639-650).pdf
Methaneethorn, J. (2024). Generative AI in education: ChatGPT and Gemini as an educational tool. Journal of Information Technology and Innovation, 23(1), 84–99. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/oarit/article/view/276023
Mingsiritham, K. (2023). ChatGPT and education in the digital age. Silpakorn Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 1–10. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/suedureasearchjournal/article/view/269776
Nillapun, M. (2012). Educational research methods (5th ed.). Silpakorn University.
Nguyen, X., Nguyen, H., Cao, L., & Hana, T. (2023). ChatGPT's understanding of history a comparison to Vietnamese students and its potential in history education. EdArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/8z9tj
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2017). Kānsō̜n prawattisāt prawattisāt Thai lāklāi withī sō̜n [Teaching history, Thai history, various teaching methods]. Bureau of Academic Affairs and Education Standards. http://academic.obec.go.th/images/document/1562662360_d_1.pdf
Office of the Education Council. (2021). Rāingān kānsưksā wičhai saphāp kānčhatkān rīan kānsō̜n wichā prawattisāt radap kānsưksā naphư̄n thān [Research study report on the teaching and learning conditions of history subject in basic education Level]. https://anyflip.com/iqdo/yqmp/basic
Pana, S. (2020). Guidelines for history instruction. Journal of Social Sciences Srinakharinwirot University, 23(2), 390–399. https://ejournals.swu.ac.th/index.php/JOS/article/view/13300
Pana, S., Saifah, Y., & Isarankura Na Ayudhaya, W. (2019). Development of history instruction based on group investigation and magic if approaches to promote historical thinking skills and historical empathy of upper secondary school students. Journal of Education Studies, Chulalongkorn University, 47(3), 454–474. https://digital.car.chula.ac.th/educujournal/vol47/iss3/25/
Pawapaiboon, W., & Amnuaiphanwilai, T. (2025). The development of learning activity package using generative AI to enhance the English writing skills of grade 9 students through image creation. Journal of Education and Innovation, 27(1), 246–259. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edujournal_nu/article/view/278086
Phuangphae, P., & Champa, S. (2015). Teaching history for enhancing critical thinking skill. Journal of Education, Silpakorn University, 13(1), 47–56. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/suedujournal/article/view/94895
Prachagool, V., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2016). Instructional model (3rd ed.). Klungnana Wittaya.
Prawatcharoenwit, N., Tongplaw, S., & Rebankoh, S. (2024). The effects of using ChatGPT in teaching mathematics at the undergraduate level. Journal of Education Khon Kaen University, 47(2), 192–204. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/EDKKUJ/article/view/267191
Ratniyom, J., & Srisamarng, A. (2025). The application of ChatGPT in problem-based learning management on the topic of work and energy. Journal of Technical and Engineering Education, 16(1), 99–108. https://so10.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/FTEJournal/article/view/1427
Ruckpuban, T. (2022). Effects of learning management using historical method on historical causes and consequences analysis abilities of eleventh grade students [Master’s thesis, Silpakorn University]. DSpace at Silpakorn University. http://ithesis-ir.su.ac.th/dspace/bitstream/123456789/4324/1/61262304.pdf
Saengsai, K. (2023). Artificial intelligence and educational development. Journal of Applied Education, 1(3), 49–60. https://so16.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JAE/article/view/264
Scott, J. (Ed). (1990). Teaching history research group, understanding cause and effect: Learning and teaching about causation and consequences in history. Longman.
Seixas, P., & Morton, T. (2013). The big six: Historical thinking concepts. Nelson Education.
Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1990). Group investigation expands cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 17–21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234687465_Group_Investigation_Expands_Cooper ative_Learning
Sintapanon, S., Sookying, F., Weerakiatsoonthorn, J., & Naparat, P. (2011). Withī sō̜n tām nǣo patirūp kānsưksā phư̄a phatthanā khunnaphāp khō̜ng yaowachon [Teaching methods based on education reform to improve the quality of young people]. 9119 Technique printing Press.
Siripipattanakul, S., Chaivisit, S., & Sriboonruang, P. (2024). ChatGPT smart chatbot technology for future learning. Journal of Education Studies, Chulalongkorn University, 52(2), 1–16. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/EDUCU/article/view/261975
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Srila, P., A., & Donhongsa, L. (2024). The development of learning achievement and critical thinking skills on history subject of Mathayomsuksa 3 students with problem-based learning management. MBU Roi Et Journal of Global Education Review, 4(3), 70–79. http://ojs.mbu.ac.th/index.php/RJGE/article/view/2585
Techasermwattanakul, P., & Suwannatthachote, P. (2025). The application of generative AI in educational research: A systematic literature review. Journal of Education and Innovation, 27(1), 158–172. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edujournal_nu/article/view/278408
Thangnatee, K., & Thanapatmeemanee, H. (2022). Blended learning activities by using group investigation (GI) to enhance computational thinking skills of Mathayomsuksa 1 students. Journal of Educational Technology and Communications Faculty of Education Mahasarakham University, 5(15), 113–126. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/etcedumsujournal/article/view/256647
Thongsophon, S. (2021). Learning management techniques on history subject to enhance citizenship competences. Journal of Education Burapha University, 32(3), 11–23. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edubuu/article/view/253590
Treerayapiwat, N., & Chaivisit, S. (2024). Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of generative artificial intelligence in higher education: SWOT analysis. Journal of Education Studies, Chulalongkorn University, 52(3), 1–17. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/EDUCU/article/view/268104
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535
Wong, R. (2023). Role of generative artificial intelligence in publishing. What is acceptable, what is not. The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology, 55(3), 103–104. https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2023033
Worakum, P. (2018). Educational research (9th ed.). Thaksila Printing.