การสร้างรูปแบบการเรียนการสอนตามทฤษฎีสรรคนิยมเพื่อส่งเสริม การให้เหตุผลทางคณิตศาสตร์ของนักศึกษาครู

Wittaya Pulsawad; Luecha  Ladachart

Authors

Wittaya Pulsawad Ph. D. Candidate. college of education University of Phayao
Luecha Ladachart College of Education University of Phayao

Keywords:

Instructional model, Mathematical reasoning, Teaching based on constructivist, Encourage reasoning, Developing an instructional model

Abstract

Abstract

Mathematics is a science with unique characteristics and nature. Mathematical knowledge can be created through the process of mathematical quest which contain mathematical reasoning. Institutions responsible for teacher training need to be aware of using instructional management to encourage trainee teachers to gain hands-on experiences in mathematical reasoning. This research aimed to 1) establish and examine the quality of teaching and learning models and 2) determine the effectiveness index of the teaching and learning model after applying the developed research process. The tools used in this research were 1) teaching and learning assessment forms 2) the learning and teaching model, and 3) a mathematical reasoning ability test. The population used in the research was 29mathematics students selected by purposive sampling. The data were analyzed to determine average, standard deviation and effectiveness index values. The results showed that the quality assessment of the teaching and learning model by 7 experts was considered the highest level for suitability. The effectiveness index was 0.62, indicating that teaching activities via the EISDGA model was a suitable approach for teaching and learning mathematics. Therefore, it could be used to effectively promote and develop mathematical reasoning of trainee teachers.

References

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University.

Anderson, T. P. (1997). Using models of instruction. In C. R. Dills and A. J. Romiszowski (eds). Instructional Development Paradigms. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

Buakhao, N., Nualpang, K. & Jenjit, A. (2019). The Effects of Learning Management Using 4E×2 Instructional Model and Higher-Order Questions on Mathematical Concepts and Reasoning Ability of Grade 8 students. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 24(1), 153-165.

Buason, R. (2011). Research and Development of Educational Innovations (2nd ed). Nakhon Sawan: Rimping Karnpim.

Buason, R. (2019). Research and Development of Educational Innovations. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House.

Chupan, W., Panicharoen, K. & Prommas, J. (2020). The effects of cognitively guided instruction on think-pair-share techniques on mathematical reasoning ability and communicative competence of eighth grade students. e-Journal of Education Studies, Burapha University, 2(4), 1-13.

Dewey, J. (1910). How We Think. Boston: D.C. Health & co., publishers.

Dossey, J. A., et al. (2002). Mathematics methods and modeling for today’s mathematics classroom: A contemporary approach to teaching grades 7-12. Pacific Grove CA: Brooks/Cole.

Ernest, D. (1993). Management: Theory and Practice (4th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Ernest, D. (1996). Personnel: Management People at Work. New York: The McMillan.

Fakkham, S., Nualpang, K. & Angganapattarakajorn, W. (2018). The Effects of Learning Management by Using Concept Attainment Model and Higher - Order Questions on Mathematical Concepts and Reasoning Ability of Mathayomsuksa II Students. Journal of Humanities and Social sciences Surin Rajabhat University, 20(2), 97-113.

Joyce, B., and Weil, M. (2009). Models of Teaching (8th ed). New York: Courtesy of Reece Galleries.

Joyce, B., Weil, M., and Calhoun E. (2009). Models of Teaching. Pennsylvania State University: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon Publishers.

Khaemmanee, T. (2007). INSTRUCTION MODEL: Various choices. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House.

Lapyingyong, N. (2018). A Development of Learning Model of Mathematical Proofs for Abilities in Writing Proofs. Ratchaphruek Journal, 16(1), 37-45.

Norqvist, M., Jonsson, B., et al. (2019). Investigating algorithmic and creative reasoning strategies by eye tracking. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, (55), 1-14.

Pattamavilai, K. and Uamcharoen, S. (2016). The Development of an Instructional Model to Enhance Reasoning, Problem Solving and Communication Skills in Mathematics of Eleventh Grade Students. Veridian E-Journal,Silpakorn University, 9(3), 377-391.

Phairojphiriyakun, N. (2021). The Development of Teaching and Learning Management Model to Enhance Mathematics Problem-Solving Competency for Mattayomsuksa 6 Students. Social Sciences Research and Academic Journal, 17(1), 17-31.

Phanphattanakun, K. (2012). Principles of Mathematics [Unpublished manuscript]. Faculty of Science and Technology, Chiang Rai Rajabhat University.

Phattaphon, M. (2019). Research and development for curriculum development and learning. Bangkok: Leadership Center for Curriculum Innovation and Learning.

Saiyot, L. and Saiyot, A. (1995). Educational Research Techniques (5th ed). Bangkok: Suweerivasarn Company Limited.

Singmui, CH. and Nilsrakhu, W. (2017). Ability to reason mathematically through integrated mathematics learning activities based on constructivist theory on probability. The 22nd Annual Meeting in Mathematics (AMM 2017), Proceedings of AMM 2017.

Slater, T. (1993). The Effectiveness of a Constructivist Epistemological Approach to the Astronomy Education of Elementary and Middle Level in Service Teachers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54(7): 2528 A.

Stipek D. (2002). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice (4th ed). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon

Von Glasersfeld, E. (2001). Radical constructivism and teaching. Perspectives, 31(2), http://vonglasersfeld.com/244.2