A Comparison of Vernacular Thai Product Identity and Value Perception between Thai and Malaysian Consumers

Main Article Content

Sarath Simsiri

Abstract

The Thai vernacular product inherited from ancestor wisdom collection. It derives from importance of living and mind responsiveness. The original vernacular arts and craft show the conformation of usage, lifestyle, wisdom of artist and local identity. Nowadays, most of the local vernacular arts and craft are contemporary products that response to the tourist need in the form of souvenir. In this regards, the studies on consumers’ different culture and their knowledge of the Thai local products are necessary to understand the customers’ thoughts. Without any supporting on value recognition of the arts and crafts, it will be very hard to make people from different culture to understand the true value. The research based on quantity research in the form of an experimental research on 2 individual Thai vernacular products. (1) The authentic products are Bencharong (five-color porcelain), silk and fish shape wickerwork while (2) the modern products are coffee set, tissue box and lamp. The products are used as stimuli to test on an acknowledgement of the consumers in 14 factors, for example, showing of culture, utilities, delicately and interesting. The method uses 7 points Likert scale questionnaire to the Thai and Malaysian target groups. 98 of the Thai sample represent local tourist while 96 Malaysian represent foreign tourist since they are the main AEC tourists. The target groups are tested on their knowledge for 2 times. Firstly, to have them see only the 6 products then answer the questions. Secondly, they would see the products and be informed of the products background and importance. All data are calculated to find the mean of each group on products acknowledgement and compared between the Thai and Malaysian by Independent-sample T-test.Culture different of the customers affect different recognition of the Thai vernacular products. The Thai target group awareness on value of the authentic products are more than the Malaysian while the Malaysian knowledge on value of the modern products are more than the Thai. Thus, we can see that to employ the result of this research depends on marketing planning to focus either on the domestic or foreign market. It can be guideline to manage important information of the product to response to the consumer requirement and improve their recognition by telling the story in many ways, for example, at the sale area, brochure, sign, packaging or by the salesperson. The next research can be studied more on the genuine tourist groups, samples, education level and branch, profession, gender and travelling style that have an effect on the product recognition and their decision to buy. Besides, more target groups from different culture can be added to compare with more than 2 other nationality apart from this research to create the widely application of the studies.

Article Details

How to Cite
Simsiri, S. . (2019). A Comparison of Vernacular Thai Product Identity and Value Perception between Thai and Malaysian Consumers. Journal of Sustainable Tourism Development, 1(2), 70–86. retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JSTD/article/view/256880
Section
Research Articles

References

กรมการท่องเที่ยว. (2554). Summary of foreign tourists in 2011 and 2013. กระทรวงการท่องเที่ยวและกีฬา.

คุณนิออน สนิทวงศ์ ณ อยุธยา. (2551). ลักษณะไทย. Bangkok: Amarin Printing & Publishing.

พัชราภา เขียวขำ. (2546). Public Relations Strategy of Thailand's Brand Project. Department of Export Promotion: CUIR at Chulalongkorn University Thailand.

วิบูลย์ ลี้สุวรรณ. (2546). Folk Art. Bangkok: Amarin Printing & Publishing.

วิบูลย์ ลี้สุวรรณ. (2553). Folk Handicrafts: Local Identity. Silpakorn University: International Journal.

ศิริวรรณ เสรีรัตน์. (2541). Business research. Bangkok: Diamond in Business World.

แสงอรุณ รัตกสิกร และนิจ หิญชีระนันทน์. (2551). ลักษณะไทย. Bangkok: Amarin Printing & Publishing.

Aaker, J. L. (2000). Accessibility or Diagnosticity? Disentangling the Influence of Culture on Persuasion Processes and Attitudes. J Consum Res 26(4), 340–57.

Ahmed, Z. U. (1996). An International Marketing Perspective of Canadian Tourists’ Shopping Behavior: Minot (North Dakota). Journal of Vacation Marketing 2(3), 207-14.

Ahn, J. Y. and G. H. Jeong. (1996). Behavioral Characteristics of Korean Outbound Travel Market: Marketing Implications for Indo-China Tourism Industry. From Conference Proceedings of the ‘Tourism in Indo-China: Opportunities for Investment, Development and Marketing’ Conference, edited by K. Chon, 54-64. Houston: University of Houston.

Anderson, L. F. and M. A. Littrell. (1995). Souvenir-Purchase Behavior of Women Tourists. Annals of Tourism Research 22 (2), 328-48.

Anderson, L. F. and M. A. Littrell. (1996). Group Profiles of Women as Tourists and Purchasers of Souvenirs. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal 25: 28–56.

Aspelin, P. L. (1977). The Anthropological Analysis of Tourism: Indirect Tourism and Political Economy in the Case of the Mamainde of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Annals of Tourism Research 4 (2), 135-60.

Eagly, Alice H., and Shelly Chaiken. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Fairhurst, A., C. Costello, and A. F. Holmes. (2007). An Examination of Shopping Behavior of Visitors to Tennessee According to Tourist Typologies. Journal of Vacation Marketing 13 (4), 311-20.

Gordon, B. (1986). The Souvenir: Messenger of the Extraordinary. Journal of Popular Culture 20 (3), 135–46.

Graburn, N. (1977). Tourism: The Sacred Journey. In Host and Guest: The Anthropology of Tourism, edited by V. Smith, 17-31. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Ho, M. C., C. H. Lin, and Y. C. Liu. (1996). Some Speculations on Developing Cultural Commodities. Journal of Design 1 (1), 1-15.

Hong, Yu and Mary Ann Littrell. (2005). Tourists' Shopping Orientations for Handcrafts. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 18 (4), 1-19.

Hong, Yu and Mary Ann Littrell. (2003). Product and Process Orientations to Tourism Shopping. Journal of Travel Research 42: 141-3.

Junyean, Moon, Doren Chadee, and Surinder Tikoo. (2006). Culture, Product Type, and Price Influences on Consumer Purchase Intention to Buy Personalized Products Online. Journal of Business Research 61, 31–9.

Kim, S. and M. A. Littrell. (2001). Souvenir Buying Intentions for Self Versus Others. Annals of Tourism Research 28 (3), 638-57.

Lee, K. P. (2004). Design Methods for a Cross-Cultural Collaborative Design Project. In Proceedings of Design Research Society International Conference: Monash University.

Leong, D. and Clark, H. (2003). Culture-Based Knowledge Towards new Design Thinking and Practice - A Dialogue. Design Issues 19 (3), 48-58.

Lickorish and Jenkins (1997)

Lin, R. T. (2005). Creative Learning Model for Cross Cultural Product. Art Appreciation 1 (12), 52–59

Lin, R. T. (2007). Transforming Taiwan aboriginal cultural features into modern product design: A case study of a cross-cultural product design model. International Journal of Design 1 (2), 45-53.

Littrell, M. A. (1990). Symbolic Significance of Textiles Crafts for Tourists. Annals of Tourism Research 17, 228–45.

Littrell, M. A., S. Baizerman, R. Kean, S. Gahring, S. Niemeyer, R. Reilly, J. Stout. (1994). Souvenirs and Tourism Styles. Journal of Travel Research 33 (1), 3–11.

MacCannell, D. (1973). Authenticity: Arrangements of Social Space in Tourist Setting. Journal of Sociology 79 (3), 589–603.

Park, M. K. (2000). Social and Cultural Factors Influencing Tourists’ Souvenir-Purchasing Behavior: A Comparative Study on Japanese ‘Omiyage’ and Korean ‘Sunmul.’ Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 9 (1/2), 81-91.

Revilla, G., and T. H. Godd. (2003). Authenticity Perceptions of Talavera Pottery. Journal of Travel Research 42 (1), 94-9.

Revilla, G., and T. H. Godd. (2003). Authenticity Perceptions of Talavera Pottery. Journal of Travel Research 42 (1), 94-9.

Robert, G. Hershberger. (1970). Architecture and Meaning. Journal of Aesthetic Education, Special Issue: The Environment and the Aesthetic Quality of Life 4 (4), 37-55.

Takada, H, and D. Jain. (1991). Cross-National Analysis of Diffusion of Consumer Durable Goods in Pacific Rim Countries. J Mark 55 (2), 48–54.

Van-Nam Huynh, Hongbin Yan, and Yoshiteru Nakamori. (2010). A Target-Based Decision-Making Approach to Consumer-Oriented Evaluation Model for Japanese Traditional Crafts. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag 57 (4).

Zaichkowsky, J. L. and J. H. Sood. (1989). A Global Look at Consumer Involvement and Use of Products. Int Mark Rev 6 (1), 20–35.