A Study of Critical Thinking Abilities of Grade 6 Students on Polygons by Using Organizing of Thinking-based Learning
Keywords:
Thinking Based Learning, Critical Thinking AbilitiesAbstract
The purpose of this research was to study of critical thinking abilities of Grade 6 students on Polygons by using of Thinking-based Learning
The sample was 27 Grade 6 students of one classroom in the second semester of the academic year 2020 that was selected by cluster random sampling from 3 classrooms, classroom was heterogeneous. The research instruments used in the experiment were 10 mathematics lesson plans on Polygons. The research instruments use to collect data were 6 items with four multiple choices of recognition of assumption, inference and deduction each component were 2 items in critical thinking test on Polygons and 4 items with essay of evaluation of argument and interpretation each components were 2 items in critical thinking test on Polygons. Percentage, Mean, Standard Deviation, and t-test were used for analyzing data.
The research findings revealed that critical thinking abilities of Grade 6 students on Polygons by using Thinking-based Learning was higher than 70% at the .05 level of significance.
References
Amporn, M. (2003). Mathematics: teaching and learning. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House. [in Thai].
Anurutwong, U. (2012). High Level of Thinking Skills: How to Develop. Bangkok: Inthanon. [in Thai].
Bellanca, James and Brandt, Ron. (2010). 21 Century Skills: Rethinking How Students Learn. USA: Solution Tree Press.
Bureau of Academic Affairs and Educational Standards. (2012). Guideline for Learning Management in Mathematics Thinking. (2nd ed.). Bangkok: Chumnumkasetakorn printing. [in Thai]
Kuntaree, P. (2014). A Study of Critical Thinking Components of Upper Secondary School Students. BU Academic Review, 13(2), 95-108. [in Thai].
National Institute of Educational Testing Service (Public Organization). (2019). Report on the results of the test the national level basic O-Net Grade 6 Year 2562. Retrieved from http://www.niet.or.th. [in Thai]
Office of the Royal Society. (2015). 80 years of Royal Institute. Bangkok: The Royal Institute. [in Thai]
Paphawara, P. (2019). Guideline for Active Learning Management. Retrieved from https://www.sesao30.go.th/module/view.php?acafile=5dc3e29c7ee16_Guidelines for teaching and learning_Active_Learning1.pdf. [in Thai]
Sarinya, M. (2019). Developing Critical Thinking Skills in the 21st Century. Journal of MCU Nan Review, (3)2, 105-122. [in Thai].
Shaver, Kelly G. (1977). Principal of Social Psychology. Massachusetts: Cambridge, Wintrop Publishing.
The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST). (2018). PISA 2018 Results: What Thai Students Know and Can Do. Bangkok: IPST Publishing. [in Thai].
Watson, G. & Glaser, E.M. (2002). Watson-Glaser critical thinking app. Revisal Manual. New York: Harcourt, Brance & World.
Watchara, L. (2017). Active learning instructional strategies for thinking development and educational improvement of the 21st century. Nakhon Pathom: Phetkasem Printing Group Co., Ltd. [in Thai].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Kasetsart Educational Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความทุกบทความเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารคณะศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์ วิทยาเขตบางเขน
วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์ปริทัศน์ (Kasetsart Educational Review)
