The Project Evaluation of Instructional Course by the Ministry of Education in English Program on the Lower Secondary Level Under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Bangkok 2

Authors

  • Worawan Phiwchote Industrial Education in Educational Adminisration Faculty of Industrial Education and Technology, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang
  • Boonchan Sisan Department of Industrial Education, Faculty of Industrial Education and Technology King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang
  • Pariyaporn Tungkunanan Department of Industrial Education, Faculty of Industrial Education and Technology King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang

Keywords:

The evaluation of the program, instruction, English

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the English programs for the lower secondary level which employ the curriculum of the Ministry of Education and are under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Bangkok 2. The four aspects that were evaluated include context, input, process and product. There were 429 samples in this study consisting of the administrators, teachers, students, and parents from the schools under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Bangkok 2 providing the instruction for the lower secondary level in accordance with the English curriculum of the Ministry of Education. The data were collected by 4 questionnaires using five-point Likert scale with 1.0 reliability and were statistically analyzed by mean and standard deviation.

The findings revealed that the overall evaluation of the English program under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Bangkok 2 providing the instruction for the lower secondary level in accordance with the English curriculum of the Ministry of Education was at a good level
( gif.latex?\bar{x}= 4.16, S.D. = 0.354). When evaluating each aspect, the context was at a very good level
( gif.latex?\bar{x}= 4.55, S.D. = 0.478), the input was at a good level ( gif.latex?\bar{x}= 4.24, S.D. = 0.426), the process was at good level ( gif.latex?\bar{x}= 4.13, S.D. = 0.371), and the product was at a good level ( gif.latex?\bar{x}= 4.11, S.D. = 0.364).

References

Anderson, E. A. (1995). Measuring service quality at a university health clinic. International journal of health care quality assurance. 8(2): 32-37.

Asfaroh, J. A., Rosana, D., and Supahar, S. (2017). An Evaluation of the Implementation of Project Assessment Problem Solving Skills Students in Science Learning. In International Conference on Science Education (ICoSEd).

Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing 5th. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.

Leikitwathana, P. (2013). Educational research. Bangkok : Faculty of Industrial Education. King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Ladkabang. [in Thai]

Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2015). Ministry of Education. Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E.2008 (A.D. 2008). Bangkok: Office of the Basic Education Commission. [in Thai]

Royal Thai Government Gazette. (2016). Act of Parliament National. Education. (1999). Amendment (Version2), 2002 and (Version3), 2010. Retrieved from https://www.mwit.ac.th [in Thai]

Sisan, B. (2017). Advanced research methods and statistics for educational administration. Bangkok: Min Service Supply. [in Thai]

Tyler, R.W. (1949). Basic Principle of Curriculum and Instruction, Chicago. University of Chicago Press.

The Secondary Educational Service Area Office Bangkok 2, (2020). Retrieved from http://www.secondary2.obec.go.th/sesao2/index2.html. [in Thai]

Worthen, B.R. and Sanders, J.R. (1973) Education Evaluation : Theory and Practice. Worthington; Charles A. Jones, Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Yildiz, D. (2004). Nicotine, its metabolism and an overview of its biological effects. Toxicon, 43(6), 619-632.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-30

Issue

Section

Research Article