Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Regarding AI Use and AI Ethics Among Teachers in the Phahonyothin School Group

Authors

  • Sivarit Trichit Faculty of Education, Kasetsart University
  • Suchada Nanthachai Department of Education, Faculty of Education, Kasetsart University
  • Sudarat Sarnsawang Department of Education, Faculty of Education, Kasetsart University

Keywords:

AI Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, Knowledge Attitude Behavior

Abstract

This study aimed (1) to examine knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to AI use and AI ethics and (2) to compare these aspects across demographic factors, including gender, generation, academic position, and school size. The population comprised 163 teachers from the Phahonyothin School Group, with data collected via a questionnaire (IOC = 0.95; reliability = 0.92) and analyzed using percentages, means, and standard deviations. Results showed that attitudes were at the highest level (µ = 4.02), particularly regarding the perceived benefits of AI, followed by high knowledge levels (69.25%), with AI ethics being the most well-understood area. Behaviors were frequently practiced (µ = 3.59), with ethical AI behaviors scoring higher than others. Comparisons revealed that participants who did not specify gender, belonged to Generation Z, were assistant teachers, or worked in small schools scored higher across all aspects, while senior professional teachers and Generation X had lower scores.

References

Arvin, N., Hoseinabady, M., Bayat, B., & Zahmatkesh, E. (2023). Teacher experiences with AI-

based educational tools. AI and Tech in Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(2), 26-32.

https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.aitech.1.2.5

Bezjak, S. (2024). Perceptions and perspectives: Understanding teachers' attitudes towards AI

in education. In Artificial Intelligence for Human-Technologies-Economy Sustainable

Development. International Conference, Lublin, Poland, 23-25 May 2024 (pp. 399-

.

Celik, I. (2023). Exploring the determinants of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy: Digital divide,

computational thinking, cognitive absorption. Telematics and Informatics, 83, 102026.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102026

Choosangnil, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence for learning. https://www.scimath.org/articletech

nology/item/10110-ai-10110 (in Thai)

Cojean, S., Brun, L., Amadieu, F., & Dessus, P. (2023). Teachers' attitudes towards AI: What is

the difference with non-AI technologies? In M. Goldwater, F. K. Anggoro, B. K. Hayes,

& D. C. Ong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 45th Annual Conference of the Cognitive

Science Society (pp. 2069-2076).

National Science and Technology Development Agency. (2022). Artificial intelligence ethics

guidelines. Office of Research Integrity (ORI), National Science and Technology

Development Agency (NSTDA). https://waa.inter.nstda.or.th/stks/pub/ori/docs/

-aw-book-ai-ethics-guideline.pdf (in Thai)

Fitria, T. N. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI) in education: Using AI tools for teaching and

learning process [Paper presentation]. Proceeding Seminar Nasional & Call For Papers.

ISSN Online: 2654-6590, ISSN Cetak: 2654-5306, Indonesia.

Khan, S. (2024). Brave new words: How AI will revolutionize education (and why that's a good

thing). Penguin Random House.

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations

[Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in

Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

Namin, S., & Suksabai, C. (2024). Artificial intelligence affecting educational design

management. Journal of Prat Prachakhom, 2(4), 60-71. (in Thai)

Poonsawat, K., Wanpeng, R., Homsai, S., & Sopon, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence and science

teaching management. Journal of Industrial Education, 21(1), C1-C8. (in Thai)

Sperling, K., Stenberg, C. J., McGrath, C., Åkerfeldt, A., Heintz, F., & Stenliden, L. (2024). In

search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in teacher education: A scoping review.

Computers and Education Open, 6, 100169.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.

100169

Downloads

Published

2025-08-31