Supply Chain Management of Processing Tomatoes Affecting Sustainability: A Case Study of the Third Royal Factory (Tao Ngoy)

Authors

  • Watcharin Tangraksa Master of Business Administration, Logistics Management, Faculty of Business Administration and Accountancy, Khon Kaen University
  • Krittapha Saenchaiyathon Logistics Management, Faculty of Business Administration and Accountancy, Khon Kaen University

Keywords:

Supply Chain Sustainability, Engagement, Relational Capital, Structural Capital, Contract Farming, Processing Tomato

Abstract

This study aims to examine the factors influencing supply chain sustainability in processing tomato production at the Third Royal Factory (Tao Ngoy), Sakon Nakhon Province, Thailand. Data were collected from 280 processing tomatoes farmers in Tao Ngoy district using a structured questionnaire that was validated for reliability and content validity. The study investigated key determinants, including supplier engagement, customer engagement, supply chain integration, relational capital, and structural capital. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis. The results indicate that supply chain management factor explain 28.8 % of the variance in supply chain sustainability. Supplier engagement has the strongest positive and statistically significant effect, followed by customer integration and relational capital. In contrast, structural capital, supplier integration, and customer engagement were not found to have statistically significant effects. The findings highlight the importance of collaboration, trust, and effective coordination among stakeholders in enhancing supply chain sustainability. In particular, relational capital plays a crucial role in fostering long-term cooperation, reducing uncertainty, and facilitating information sharing among supply chain actors. These results are consistent with Social Capital Theory, which emphasizes the importance of networks and relationships in achieving collective outcomes. This study contributes to the literature on sustainable supply chain management in agricultural contexts, particularly in developing countries. It also provides practical implications by recommending the promotion of contract farming networks, strengthening stakeholder relationships, and improving information integration to enhance   the sustainability and resilience of agri-food supply chains.

References

Aslam, H., Waseem, M., Muneeb, D., Ali, Z., Roubaud, D. and Grebinevych, O. (2023). Customer integration in the supply chain: The role of market orientation and supply chain strategy in the age of digital revolution. Annals of Operations Research, 348, 2145-2169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05191-y

Borsellino, V., Schimmenti, E. and Bilali, H. E. (2020). Agri-food markets towards Sustainable patterns. Sustainability, 12(6), 2193. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062193

Carmeli, A., Zivan, I., Gomes, E. and Markman, G. D. (2021). Underlying micro socio-psychological mechanisms of buyer–supplier relationships: Implications for inter-organizational learning agility. Human Resource Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.002

Chen, X., Guo, S., Xiong, J. and Ye, Z. (2023). Customer engagement, dependence, and loyalty: An empirical study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 197, 122920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122920

Chopra, S. and Meindl, P. (2019). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation (7th ed.). Pearson.

Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S. and Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. Yale University Press.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. and Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.

Handfield, R. B., Cousins, P. D., Lawson, B. and Petersen, K. J. (2015). How can supply management really improve performance?. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51(3), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12066

Shafiee, M. M., Warkentin, M. and Motamed, S. (2024). Do human capital and relational capital influence knowledge-intensive firm competitiveness?. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(1), 138–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2022-0921

Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An introductory analysis (3rd ed.). Harper & Row.

Yang, Q., Li, S., Cui, H. and Qiao, J. (2023). How does supplier relationship management affect supplier innovation contribution? Industrial Marketing Management, 114, 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.08.003

Ye, Y., Yang, L., Huo, B. and Zhao, X. (2023). The impact of supply chain social capital on supply chain performance: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 38(5), 1176–1190. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-09-2021-0423

Yeh, T.-M., Pai, F.-Y. and Wu, L.-C. (2020). Relationship stability and supply chain performance for SMEs: From internal, supplier, and customer integration perspectives. Mathematics, 8(11), 1902. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8111902

Yu, D. Z. and Um, K.-H. (2024). Exploring the nexus of supplier and customer integration: Unraveling the impact on disruption absorption capability with IT alignment. Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, 52(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2024.52.2.221

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

Tangraksa, W. ., & Saenchaiyathon, K. . (2026). Supply Chain Management of Processing Tomatoes Affecting Sustainability: A Case Study of the Third Royal Factory (Tao Ngoy). NEU ACADEMIC AND RESEARCH JOURNAL, 16(2), 117–131. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/neuarj/article/view/284024

Issue

Section

Research Article